Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
JUNP vs PMJN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 JUNP can fall 2.5% before its buffer engages and PMJN 1.9%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about JUNP and PMJNNet assets on Nov 4, 2026: $103m for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June and $10m for PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - June.
JUNP: reference +1.4% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +15.9%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
JUNP: reference +1.4% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +15.9%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.PMJN: reference +1.4% since period start, fund +1.4%; buffer Floor; cap +7.4%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.50% a year; their one-year returns differ by 3.2 points; JUNP is 10.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | JUNP | PMJN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +8.0% | +4.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 1.4% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $103m | $10m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | JUNP | PMJN | JUNP | PMJN |
| 3 months | +0.3% | +0.7% | +0.7 pts | +1.1 pts |
| 6 months | +2.4% | +1.7% | −2.1 pts | −2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +8.0% | +4.8% | −5.5 pts | −8.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: JUNP Jun 2024 · PMJN Jun 2025 | +29.6% | +8.2% | −15.7 pts | −21.2 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. PMJN is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. JUNP is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are PGIM funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
JUNP resets first, on May 31, 2027, 208 days from now; PMJN runs to May 31, 2027, 208 days. JUNP can still gain 13.0% before its cap, PMJN 5.4%. A fall from here reaches JUNP’s buffer after 2.5% and PMJN’s after 1.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
JUNP
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 13.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 208 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
PMJN
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JUNP against PMJN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/junp-vs-pmjn
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). JUNP against PMJN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/junp-vs-pmjn
[JUNP against PMJN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/junp-vs-pmjn)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.