Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JUNM vs XBJL: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 XBJL can fall 3.1% before its buffer engages and JUNM 1.9%, and JUNM resets 13 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jul.

1.9%JUNM can fall this far before its buffer
3.1%XBJL can fall this far before its buffer
5.4%JUNM can still gain
10.3%XBJL can still gain
JUNMFull floor
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+7.3% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+7.3% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%
XBJLBetween buffer and cap
9 pts−9.0% floor0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%−9.0% floor0% start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. JUNM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. XBJL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

JUNM resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 269 days from now; XBJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 282 days. JUNM can still gain 5.4% before its cap, XBJL 10.3%. A fall from here reaches JUNM’s buffer after 1.9% and XBJL’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

JUNM and XBJL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
JUNMXBJLJUNMXBJL
3 months+0.6%+2.4%−1.6 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+3.2%+8.0%−14.8 pts−10.0 pts
1 year+4.6%+9.5%−11.9 pts−7.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+40.8%not published−37.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JUNM and XBJL on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JUNM
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - June
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.3%, over a period ending Jun 17, 2027
XBJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jul
Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer100%9%
Outcome periodJun 22, 2026 to Jun 17, 2027Jun 30, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left269282
Starting cap+7.3%+13.8%
Can still gain5.4%10.3%
Fall before buffer1.9%3.1%
Protection left, index points100.0% of 100.0%9.0% of 9.0%
Index return this period+3.6%+3.6%
Fund return this period+1.0%+3.0%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets$67m$77m

JUNM in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 269 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XBJL in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 282 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, JUNM or XBJL?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, JUNM can gain about 5.4% before its cap and XBJL about 10.3%, so XBJL has more room left this period.
Which resets first, JUNM or XBJL?
JUNM ends its outcome period on Jun 17, 2027 and XBJL on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, JUNM or XBJL?
JUNM charges 0.85% a year and XBJL charges 0.79%, so XBJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JUNM against XBJL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JUNM against XBJL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/junm-vs-xbjl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources