Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
JULU vs XJUN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 XJUN can fall 3.6% before its buffer engages and JULU 1.9%, and XJUN resets 13 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about JULU and XJUN
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $79m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Jul and $137m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - June.
JULU: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +1.2%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
JULU: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +1.2%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.XJUN: reference +2.7% since period start, fund +2.9%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +11.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
JULU costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; XJUN is 1.7 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | JULU | XJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +7.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 2.6% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $79m | $137m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | JULU | XJUN | JULU | XJUN |
| 3 months | +0.1% | +1.2% | +0.5 pts | +1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +2.9% | +3.5% | −1.6 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 1 year | +9.9% | +7.8% | −3.7 pts | −5.8 pts |
| 3 years | – | +35.7% | – | −40.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: JULU Jul 2024 · XJUN Jul 2021 | +29.3% | +54.0% | −11.3 pts | −22.1 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. XJUN is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. JULU is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
XJUN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 225 days from now; JULU runs to Jun 30, 2027, 238 days. A fall from here reaches JULU’s buffer after 1.9% and XJUN’s after 3.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
JULU
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 1.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
XJUN
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. 225 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JULU against XJUN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/julu-vs-xjun
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). JULU against XJUN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/julu-vs-xjun
[JULU against XJUN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/julu-vs-xjun)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.