Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GFEB vs MARW: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 GFEB can fall 7.7% before its buffer engages and MARW 7.0%, and GFEB resets 9 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GFEB and MARW
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $369m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - February and $86m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 ETF - Mar.
GFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +7.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.MARW: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +6.7%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +10.8%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MARW: reference +11.8% since period start, fund +6.7%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +10.8%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
MARW costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; GFEB is 4.3 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GFEB | MARW |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% | +10.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 10.1% | 10.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.74% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $369m | $86m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GFEB | MARW | GFEB | MARW |
| 3 months | +1.5% | +1.4% | +1.8 pts | +1.8 pts |
| 6 months | +4.3% | +3.8% | −0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
| 1 year | +11.2% | +10.0% | −2.4 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 3 years | +45.4% | +38.0% | −31.0 pts | −38.4 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: GFEB Feb 2023 · MARW Mar 2023 | +56.2% | +48.5% | −36.0 pts | −45.7 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MARW is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
GFEB resets first, on Feb 19, 2027, 107 days from now; MARW runs to Feb 28, 2027, 116 days. GFEB can still gain 3.5% before its cap, MARW 3.2%. A fall from here reaches GFEB’s buffer after 7.7% and MARW’s after 7.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
GFEB
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 3.5% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 7.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 107 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
MARW
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +10.8% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.2% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 7.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 116 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GFEB against MARW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gfeb-vs-marw
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GFEB against MARW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gfeb-vs-marw
[GFEB against MARW (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/gfeb-vs-marw)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.