Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Buffer ETFs

FFEB vs UMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

As of Nov 4, 2026 UMAR can fall 12.0% before its buffer engages and FFEB 8.9%, and FFEB resets 9 days sooner.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FFEB and UMAR

Net assets: $1.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February, and $143m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Mar.

At a glance
8.9%
FFEB can fall this far before its buffer
12.0%
UMAR can fall this far before its buffer
4.9%
FFEB can still gain
3.9%
UMAR can still gain
FFEB Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capFFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +8.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.10 pts of buffer+11.2% gain captured−10.0% floor0% period start+15.0% cap+3.8% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.2%Between buffer and capFFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +8.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.+11.2%−10.0% floor0% start+15.0% cap10 pts of buffer+3.8% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.2%

FFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +8.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FFEB: reference +11.2% since period start, fund +8.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
UMAR Between buffer and cap
Between buffer and capUMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +7.3%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.30 pts of buffer+11.7% gain captured−35.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+12.1% capfirst 5 pts are yours to lose+0.3% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.7%Between buffer and capUMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +7.3%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.30 pts of buffer+11.7%−35.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+12.1% capfirst 5 pts are yours to lose+0.3% more to the capTODAY · SPY +11.7%

UMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +7.3%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

UMAR: reference +11.7% since period start, fund +7.3%; buffer −5 to −35; cap +12.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

UMAR costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points; FFEB is 9.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FFEB vs UMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureFFEBUMAR
Return
Total return, 1 year+13.7%+11.0%
Drawdown
Index fall to the buffer10.1%15.0%
Benchmark
What it tracksSPYSPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$1.4bn$142m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score · FFEB scores higher If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
IQ Buffer Score38.7FFEB12.5UMAR

How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Mar 13, 2020 to Oct 30, 2026 · 346 weekly returns · each against SPY
FFEB UMAR
Return
Total return edge FFEB +137.1% +70.3%
Annualized edge FFEB +13.9% +8.3%
Price return edge FFEB +137.1% +70.3%
Risk
Volatility edge UMAR 11.6% 7.0%
Max drawdown edge UMAR −13.2% −8.2%
Downside capture 65.8% 40.9%
Beta 0.63 0.36
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FFEB 0.92 0.75
Sortino edge FFEB 1.41 1.09
Treynor 0.170 0.146
Calmar edge FFEB (slight) 1.05 1.01
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.9% a year −0.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.94 −0.36
Information ratio −0.69 −0.87
Tracking error 7.2% 11.8%
Reading

From Mar 2020 to Oct 2026, FFEB returned more: +137.1% to +70.3%. UMAR swung less: 7.0% to 11.6%. UMAR fell less at its worst: −8.2% to −13.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FFEB vs UMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
MeasureFFEBUMARSPYEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+137.1%+70.3%FFEBPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.9%+8.3%FFEBTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+137.1%+70.3%FFEBPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility11.6%7.0%UMARSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation7.6%4.8%UMARLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−13.2%−8.2%UMARDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture49.7%25.3%100.0%FFEBShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture65.8%40.9%100.0%UMARShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.630.361.00UMAR lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.960.871.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.920.75FFEBReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.411.09FFEBReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1700.1460.156FFEBReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.051.01FFEB (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYSPYSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.9% a year−0.4% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.94−0.36Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.0% to +2.8%−2.3% to +1.6%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.69−0.87FFEBReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.2%11.8%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 346 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

Window by window

Window by window: FFEB vs UMAR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
Total returnGap to the reference's price return
WindowFFEBUMARFFEBUMAR
3 months+1.3%+1.5%+1.7 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+4.8%+4.3%+0.3 pts−0.1 pts
1 year+13.7%+11.0%+0.1 pts−2.5 pts
3 years+59.7%+44.0%−16.7 pts−32.4 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FFEB Feb 2020 · UMAR Mar 2020+109.3%+64.9%−28.6 pts−83.2 pts

Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

FFEB FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - February · Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 15.0%, over a period ending Feb 19, 2027 UMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - Mar · Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 35.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 12.1%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027
Reference index SPY SPY
Buffer 10% 5% to 35%
Outcome period Feb 23, 2026 to Feb 19, 2027 Feb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027
Days left 107 116
Starting cap +15.0% +12.1%
Can still gain 4.9% 3.9%
Fall before buffer 8.9% 12.0%
Protection left, index points 10.0% of 10.0% 30.0% of 30.0%
Index return this period +11.2% +11.7%
Fund return this period +8.9% +7.3%
State today Open Open
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.79%
Net assets, FFEB as of Nov 3, 2026 and UMAR as of Nov 4, 2026 $1.4bn $143m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Where each one stands today

FFEB resets first, on Feb 19, 2027, 107 days from now; UMAR runs to Feb 28, 2027, 116 days. FFEB can still gain 4.9% before its cap, UMAR 3.9%. A fall from here reaches FFEB’s buffer after 8.9% and UMAR’s after 12.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FFEB and UMAR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FFEB

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 107 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 19, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

UMAR

From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 3.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 12.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 15.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 116 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, FFEB or UMAR?
From their prices on Nov 4, 2026, FFEB can gain about 4.9% before its cap and UMAR about 3.9%, so FFEB has more room left this period.
Which resets first, FFEB or UMAR?
FFEB ends its outcome period on Feb 19, 2027 and UMAR on Feb 28, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, FFEB or UMAR?
FFEB charges 0.85% a year and UMAR charges 0.79%, so UMAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FFEB against UMAR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ffeb-vs-umar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.