Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
FEBU vs XJAN: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 XJAN can fall 7.6% before its buffer engages and FEBU 7.4%, and XJAN resets 16 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FEBU and XJAN
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $47m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Feb and $72m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January.
FEBU: reference +10.8% since period start, fund +7.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
FEBU: reference +10.8% since period start, fund +7.1%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.XJAN: reference +10.8% since period start, fund +7.3%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +9.9%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
FEBU costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; XJAN is 1.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | FEBU | XJAN |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +9.0% | +9.2% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 9.8% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $47m | $72m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FEBU | XJAN | FEBU | XJAN |
| 3 months | −1.3% | +1.7% | −0.9 pts | +2.0 pts |
| 6 months | +2.3% | +4.3% | −2.2 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 1 year | +9.0% | +9.2% | −4.6 pts | −4.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: FEBU Feb 2025 · XJAN Jan 2024 | +19.7% | +27.9% | −8.6 pts | −30.7 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. XJAN is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. FEBU is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
XJAN is already at its cap, so more rise in the index adds nothing to it before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
XJAN resets first, on Jan 15, 2027, 72 days from now; FEBU runs to Jan 31, 2027, 88 days. A fall from here reaches FEBU’s buffer after 7.4% and XJAN’s after 7.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
FEBU
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 7.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 9.8% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 88 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jan 31, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
XJAN
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +9.9% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 7.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. 72 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Jan 15, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FEBU against XJAN, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/febu-vs-xjan
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). FEBU against XJAN. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/febu-vs-xjan
[FEBU against XJAN (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/febu-vs-xjan)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.