Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DLMY vs FMAY: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 DLMY can fall 4.5% before its buffer engages and FMAY 4.5%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DLMY and FMAYNet assets on Nov 3, 2026: $12m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Dual Directional Buffer ETF - May and $1.5bn for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May.
DLMY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +14.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DLMY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.9%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +14.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.FMAY: reference +3.7% since period start, fund +3.8%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +17.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.85% a year; FMAY is far larger, $1.5bn against $12m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DLMY | FMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +9.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 3.6% | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $12m | $1.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DLMY | FMAY | DLMY | FMAY |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +0.5% | +1.2 pts | +0.9 pts |
| 6 months | – | +3.8% | – | −0.7 pts |
| 1 year | – | +9.9% | – | −3.6 pts |
| 3 years | – | +48.5% | – | −27.9 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DLMY May 2026 · FMAY May 2020 | +3.6% | +85.5% | −0.2 pts | −74.4 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. FMAY is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DLMY is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are First Trust funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
DLMY resets first, on May 21, 2027, 198 days from now; FMAY runs to May 21, 2027, 198 days. DLMY can still gain 9.0% before its cap, FMAY 12.0%. A fall from here reaches DLMY’s buffer after 4.5% and FMAY’s after 4.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DLMY
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 4.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 198 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On May 21, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
FMAY
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.0% more before it reaches its cap.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DLMY against FMAY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dlmy-vs-fmay
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DLMY against FMAY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dlmy-vs-fmay
[DLMY against FMAY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/dlmy-vs-fmay)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.