Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DJUN vs XBJL: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 DJUN can fall 7.9% before its buffer engages and XBJL 3.1%, and DJUN resets 13 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jul.

7.9%DJUN can fall this far before its buffer
3.1%XBJL can fall this far before its buffer
10.3%DJUN can still gain
10.3%XBJL can still gain
DJUNBetween buffer and cap
25 pts of buffer+3.6%+10% more to the cap−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+13.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%25 pts of buffer−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+13.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%
XBJLBetween buffer and cap
9 pts of buffer+3.6%+10.2% to cap−9.0% floor0% period start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%9 pts−9.0% floor0% start+13.8% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. XBJL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DJUN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DJUN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 269 days from now; XBJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 282 days. DJUN can still gain 10.3% before its cap, XBJL 10.3%. A fall from here reaches DJUN’s buffer after 7.9% and XBJL’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DJUN and XBJL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DJUNXBJLDJUNXBJL
3 months+1.4%+2.4%−0.8 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+6.8%+8.0%−11.3 pts−10.0 pts
1 year+7.7%+9.5%−8.8 pts−7.1 pts
3 years+38.5%+40.8%−39.9 pts−37.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DJUN and XBJL on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DJUN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 30.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 13.6%, over a period ending Jun 17, 2027
XBJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jul
Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.8%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer5% to 30%9%
Outcome periodJun 22, 2026 to Jun 17, 2027Jun 30, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left269282
Starting cap+13.6%+13.8%
Can still gain10.3%10.3%
Fall before buffer7.9%3.1%
Protection left, index points25.0% of 25.0%9.0% of 9.0%
Index return this period+3.6%+3.6%
Fund return this period+2.3%+3.0%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets$357m$77m

DJUN in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 7.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 8.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 269 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XBJL in plain words

The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 282 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DJUN or XBJL?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DJUN can gain about 10.3% before its cap and XBJL about 10.3%, so XBJL has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DJUN or XBJL?
DJUN ends its outcome period on Jun 17, 2027 and XBJL on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DJUN or XBJL?
DJUN charges 0.85% a year and XBJL charges 0.79%, so XBJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DJUN against XBJL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DJUN against XBJL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/djun-vs-xbjl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources