Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DJUN vs PMJL: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 DJUN can fall 7.9% before its buffer engages and PMJL 1.7%, and DJUN resets 13 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July.

7.9%DJUN can fall this far before its buffer
1.7%PMJL can fall this far before its buffer
10.3%DJUN can still gain
6.1%PMJL can still gain
DJUNBetween buffer and cap
25 pts of buffer−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% period start+13.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%25 pts−30.0% floor−5.0% buffer start0% start+13.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%
PMJLFull floor
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+8.0% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+8.0% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. PMJL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DJUN is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DJUN resets first, on Jun 17, 2027, 269 days from now; PMJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 282 days. DJUN can still gain 10.3% before its cap, PMJL 6.1%. A fall from here reaches DJUN’s buffer after 7.9% and PMJL’s after 1.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DJUN and PMJL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DJUNPMJLDJUNPMJL
3 months+1.4%+1.1%−0.8 pts−1.2 pts
6 months+6.8%+4.2%−11.3 pts−13.8 pts
1 year+7.7%+5.6%−8.8 pts−11.0 pts
3 years+38.5%not published−39.9 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DJUN and PMJL on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DJUN
FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 30.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 13.6%, over a period ending Jun 17, 2027
PMJL
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - July
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 8.0%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer5% to 30%100%
Outcome periodJun 22, 2026 to Jun 17, 2027Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left269282
Starting cap+13.6%+8.0%
Can still gain10.3%6.1%
Fall before buffer7.9%1.7%
Protection left, index points25.0% of 25.0%100.0% of 100.0%
Index return this period+3.6%+3.6%
Fund return this period+2.3%+1.3%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.50%
Net assets$357m$7m

DJUN in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 10.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 7.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 8.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 269 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PMJL in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 282 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DJUN or PMJL?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DJUN can gain about 10.3% before its cap and PMJL about 6.1%, so DJUN has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DJUN or PMJL?
DJUN ends its outcome period on Jun 17, 2027 and PMJL on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DJUN or PMJL?
DJUN charges 0.85% a year and PMJL charges 0.50%, so PMJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DJUN against PMJL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DJUN against PMJL, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/djun-vs-pmjl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources