Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DECM vs XBJA: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 XBJA can fall 9.3% before its buffer engages and DECM 5.8%, and DECM resets 13 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DECM and XBJA
Net assets: $35m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - December, and $95m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - Jan.
DECM: reference +12.7% since period start, fund +5.3%; buffer 0 to −51; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DECM: reference +12.7% since period start, fund +5.3%; buffer 0 to −51; cap +7.0%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.XBJA: reference +12.4% since period start, fund +9.4%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +11.9%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XBJA: reference +12.4% since period start, fund +9.4%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +11.9%; At its cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
XBJA costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.7 points; XBJA is 2.7 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DECM | XBJA |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +6.4% | +11.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 11.2% | 11.0% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.79% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $35m | $94m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DECM | XBJA | DECM | XBJA |
| 3 months | +1.3% | +1.9% | +1.7 pts | +2.3 pts |
| 6 months | +3.0% | +5.1% | −1.5 pts | +0.6 pts |
| 1 year | +6.4% | +11.1% | −7.2 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 3 years | – | +39.1% | – | −37.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DECM Dec 2024 · XBJA Jan 2022 | +11.9% | +41.1% | −17.0 pts | −19.4 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. XBJA is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DECM is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are already at their cap, so neither gains from more rise in the index before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
DECM resets first, on Dec 18, 2026, 44 days from now; XBJA runs to Dec 31, 2026, 57 days. DECM can still gain 0.8% before its cap, XBJA 1.6%. A fall from here reaches DECM’s buffer after 5.8% and XBJA’s after 9.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DECM
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.0% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.8% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 5.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 50.6% of the 50.6% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 44 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Dec 18, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
XBJA
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +11.9% for the period on Nov 4, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.6% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 9.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 57 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DECM against XBJA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/decm-vs-xbja
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DECM against XBJA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/decm-vs-xbja
[DECM against XBJA (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/decm-vs-xbja)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.