Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DDTJ vs JAJL: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 DDTJ can fall 9.3% before its buffer engages and JAJL 1.9%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DDTJ and JAJL
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $18m for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - Jan and $305m for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Jan/Jul.
DDTJ: reference +12.4% since period start, fund +9.4%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +12.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DDTJ: reference +12.4% since period start, fund +9.4%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +12.8%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.JAJL: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +1.7%; buffer Floor; cap +4.1%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.79% a year; JAJL is 16.9 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DDTJ | JAJL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +5.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 11.0% | 2.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $18m | $305m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DDTJ | JAJL | DDTJ | JAJL |
| 3 months | +1.4% | +0.8% | +1.8 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +4.8% | +2.6% | +0.3 pts | −1.9 pts |
| 1 year | – | +5.7% | – | −7.9 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: DDTJ Jan 2026 · JAJL Jul 2024 | +9.1% | +16.5% | −3.1 pts | −24.1 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. JAJL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDTJ is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are Innovator funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
DDTJ resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 57 days from now; JAJL runs to Dec 31, 2026, 57 days. DDTJ can still gain 2.4% before its cap, JAJL 2.1%. A fall from here reaches DDTJ’s buffer after 9.3% and JAJL’s after 1.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
DDTJ
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 2.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 9.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 57 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JAJL
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 2.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DDTJ against JAJL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddtj-vs-jajl
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DDTJ against JAJL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddtj-vs-jajl
[DDTJ against JAJL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddtj-vs-jajl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.