Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DDFZ vs PBJN: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 PBJN can fall 2.5% before its buffer engages and DDFZ 2.5%.

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Jun and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June .

2.5%DDFZ can fall this far before its buffer
2.5%PBJN can fall this far before its buffer
7.9%DDFZ can still gain
9.3%PBJN can still gain
DDFZBetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer+8.4% more to the cap−15.0% floor0% period start+10.7% capTODAY · SPY +2.3%15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+10.7% capTODAY · SPY +2.3%
PBJNBetween buffer and cap
20 pts of buffer+9.8% more to the cap−20.0% floor0% period start+12.1% capTODAY · SPY +2.3%20 pts of buffer−20.0% floor0% start+12.1% capTODAY · SPY +2.3%

These are two different products. PBJN is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDFZ is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DDFZ resets first, on May 31, 2027, 252 days from now; PBJN runs to May 31, 2027, 252 days. DDFZ can still gain 7.9% before its cap, PBJN 9.3%. A fall from here reaches DDFZ’s buffer after 2.5% and PBJN’s after 2.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DDFZ and PBJN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DDFZPBJNDDFZPBJN
3 months+1.9%+1.6%−0.4 pts−0.6 pts
6 monthsnot published+5.2%not published−12.8 pts
1 yearnot published+6.9%not published−9.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DDFZ and PBJN on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDFZ
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Jun
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 10.7%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
PBJN
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June
Absorbs the first 20% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 12.1%, over a period ending May 31, 2027
IssuerInnovatorPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%20%
Outcome periodMay 31, 2026 to May 31, 2027Jun 1, 2026 to May 31, 2027
Days left252252
Starting cap+10.7%+12.1%
Can still gain7.9%9.3%
Fall before buffer2.5%2.5%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%20.0% of 20.0%
Index return this period+2.3%+2.3%
Fund return this period+2.3%+2.1%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.79%0.50%
Net assets$152m$58m

DDFZ in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.9% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 252 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On May 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

PBJN in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.3% more before it reaches its cap. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DDFZ or PBJN?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DDFZ can gain about 7.9% before its cap and PBJN about 9.3%, so PBJN has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DDFZ or PBJN?
DDFZ ends its outcome period on May 31, 2027 and PBJN on May 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DDFZ or PBJN?
DDFZ charges 0.79% a year and PBJN charges 0.50%, so PBJN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DDFZ against PBJN, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDFZ against PBJN, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddfz-vs-pbjn Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources