Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DDFM vs MRCP: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 MRCP can fall 8.2% before its buffer engages and DDFM 5.9%.

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Mar and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March.

5.9%DDFM can fall this far before its buffer
8.2%MRCP can fall this far before its buffer
3.3%DDFM can still gain
5.2%MRCP can still gain
DDFMAt its cap
15 pts of buffer+9.8% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+9.8% capTODAY · SPY +12.8%15 pts+9.8%−15.0% floor0% start+9.8% capTODAY · SPY +12.8%
MRCPBetween buffer and cap
12 pts of buffer+12.8% gain captured−12.0% floor0% period start+14.5% capTODAY · SPY +12.8%12 pts+12.8% gained−12.0% floor0% start+14.5% capTODAY · SPY +12.8%

These are two different products. MRCP is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDFM is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DDFM resets first, on Feb 28, 2027, 160 days from now; MRCP runs to Feb 28, 2027, 160 days. DDFM can still gain 3.3% before its cap, MRCP 5.2%. A fall from here reaches DDFM’s buffer after 5.9% and MRCP’s after 8.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DDFM and MRCP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DDFMMRCPDDFMMRCP
3 months+1.8%+2.5%−0.4 pts+0.2 pts
6 months+7.3%+11.4%−10.7 pts−6.6 pts
1 yearnot published+13.2%not published−3.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DDFM and MRCP on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDFM
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Mar
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 9.8%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027
MRCP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - March
Absorbs the first 12% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.5%, over a period ending Feb 28, 2027
IssuerInnovatorPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%12%
Outcome periodFeb 28, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027Mar 1, 2026 to Feb 28, 2027
Days left160160
Starting cap+9.8%+14.5%
Can still gain3.3%5.2%
Fall before buffer5.9%8.2%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%12.0% of 12.0%
Index return this period+12.8%+12.8%
Fund return this period+5.8%+8.4%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.79%0.50%
Net assets$45m$29m

DDFM in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +9.8% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.3% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 5.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 160 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Feb 28, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

MRCP in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DDFM or MRCP?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DDFM can gain about 3.3% before its cap and MRCP about 5.2%, so MRCP has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DDFM or MRCP?
DDFM ends its outcome period on Feb 28, 2027 and MRCP on Feb 28, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DDFM or MRCP?
DDFM charges 0.79% a year and MRCP charges 0.50%, so MRCP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DDFM against MRCP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDFM against MRCP, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddfm-vs-mrcp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources