Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DDFF vs FEBP: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 FEBP can fall 8.3% before its buffer engages and DDFF 6.1%.

Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Feb and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - February.

6.1%DDFF can fall this far before its buffer
8.3%FEBP can fall this far before its buffer
2.7%DDFF can still gain
4.8%FEBP can still gain
DDFFAt its cap
15 pts of buffer+9.3% gain captured−15.0% floor0% period start+9.3% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%15 pts+9.3%−15.0% floor0% start+9.3% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%
FEBPBetween buffer and cap
12 pts of buffer+11.8% gain captured−12.0% floor0% period start+14.2% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%12 pts+11.8%−12.0% floor0% start+14.2% capTODAY · SPY +11.8%

These are two different products. FEBP is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDFF is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Where each one stands today

DDFF resets first, on Jan 31, 2027, 132 days from now; FEBP runs to Jan 31, 2027, 132 days. DDFF can still gain 2.7% before its cap, FEBP 4.8%. A fall from here reaches DDFF’s buffer after 6.1% and FEBP’s after 8.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

DDFF and FEBP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
DDFFFEBPDDFFFEBP
3 months+1.8%+2.4%−0.5 pts+0.1 pts
6 months+7.6%+11.7%−10.5 pts−6.3 pts
1 yearnot published+13.1%not published−3.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DDFF and FEBP on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DDFF
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Feb
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 9.3%, over a period ending Jan 31, 2027
FEBP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - February
Absorbs the first 12% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.2%, over a period ending Jan 31, 2027
IssuerInnovatorPGIM
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer15%12%
Outcome periodJan 31, 2026 to Jan 31, 2027Feb 1, 2026 to Jan 31, 2027
Days left132132
Starting cap+9.3%+14.2%
Can still gain2.7%4.8%
Fall before buffer6.1%8.3%
Protection left, index points15.0% of 15.0%12.0% of 12.0%
Index return this period+11.8%+11.8%
Fund return this period+5.9%+8.5%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.79%0.50%
Net assets$59m$29m

DDFF in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +9.3% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 2.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 6.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 10.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 132 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jan 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

FEBP in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 8.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, DDFF or FEBP?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, DDFF can gain about 2.7% before its cap and FEBP about 4.8%, so FEBP has more room left this period.
Which resets first, DDFF or FEBP?
DDFF ends its outcome period on Jan 31, 2027 and FEBP on Jan 31, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, DDFF or FEBP?
DDFF charges 0.79% a year and FEBP charges 0.50%, so FEBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DDFF against FEBP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DDFF against FEBP, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ddff-vs-febp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources