CTMA vs FAPR: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 FAPR can fall 6.6% before its buffer engages and CTMA 6.0%, and FAPR resets 14 days sooner. Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April.
CTMA costs 0.55 points a year less; FAPR is 736.3 times larger.
| CTMA | FAPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.85% |
| Net assets | $2m | $1.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +10.4% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
CTMA: reference +6.3% since period start, fund +3.8%; buffer 0 to −30; cap +11.5%; Between buffer and cap.
FAPR: reference +8.4% since period start, fund +6.1%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +15.2%; Between buffer and cap.
A percentile among the 294 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Where each one stands today
FAPR resets first, on Apr 16, 2027, 196 days from now; CTMA runs to Apr 30, 2027, 210 days. A fall from here reaches CTMA’s buffer after 6.0% and FAPR’s after 6.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CTMA | FAPR | CTMA | FAPR |
| 3 months | +1.8% | +3.0% | −1.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +6.7% | not published | −11.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +10.4% | not published | −5.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +50.6% | not published | −38.6 pts |
CTMA and FAPR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CTMA and FAPR on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTMA in plain words
The fund's price can fall 6.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 6.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 210 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Apr 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
FAPR in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 6.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 7.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 196 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Apr 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CTMA against FAPR, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctma-vs-fapr
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTMA against FAPR, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctma-vs-fapr Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CTMA against FAPR, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctma-vs-fapr
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). CTMA against FAPR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctma-vs-fapr
- Markdown
- [CTMA against FAPR (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctma-vs-fapr)