Data as of .
CTJL vs JULP: which one stands where?
As of Sep 21, 2026 JULP can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and CTJL 2.1%, and JULP resets 3 days sooner.
ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: CTJL scores higher
If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?
A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
Where each one stands today
JULP resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 282 days from now; CTJL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 285 days. A fall from here reaches CTJL’s buffer after 2.1% and JULP’s after 3.3%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Gap to the reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTJL | JULP | CTJL | JULP | |
| 3 months | not published | +2.2% | not published | −0.1 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +9.9% | not published | −8.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +10.7% | not published | −5.8 pts |
| CTJL Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.3%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027 | JULP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July Absorbs the first 12% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 16.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027 | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Corgi | PGIM |
| Reference index | SPY | SPY |
| Buffer | 30% | 12% |
| Outcome period | Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027 | Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027 |
| Days left | 285 | 282 |
| Starting cap | +14.3% | +16.2% |
| Can still gain | not published | 12.4% |
| Fall before buffer | 2.1% | 3.3% |
| Protection left, index points | 30.0% of 30.0% | 12.0% of 12.0% |
| Index return this period | +2.1% | +3.6% |
| Fund return this period | +2.0% | +2.9% |
| State today | Open | Open |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $1m | $37m |
CTJL in plain words
The fund's price can fall 2.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 285 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULP in plain words
From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 282 days remained on Sep 21, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which resets first, CTJL or JULP?
- CTJL ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and JULP on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
- Which is cheaper, CTJL or JULP?
- CTJL charges 0.30% a year and JULP charges 0.50%, so CTJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTJL against JULP, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-julp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.