Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CTJL vs JULC: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 CTJL can fall 2.1% before its buffer engages and JULC 2.1%.

Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: CTJL scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

CTJL 98.3JULC 38.10.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CTJLBetween buffer and cap
30 pts of buffer+12.2% more to the cap−30.0% floor0% period start+14.3% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%30 pts of buffer−30.0% floor0% start+14.3% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%
JULCBetween buffer and cap
10 pts of buffer+16.1% more to the cap−10.0% floor0% period start+18.2% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%−10.0% floor0% start+18.2% capTODAY · SPY +2.1%

Both are Corgi funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

CTJL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 285 days from now; JULC runs to Jun 30, 2027, 285 days. A fall from here reaches CTJL’s buffer after 2.1% and JULC’s after 2.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CTJL and JULC on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTJL
Corgi U.S. Equities 30% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series
Absorbs the first 30% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 14.3%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
JULC
Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 18.2%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027
IssuerCorgiCorgi
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer30%10%
Outcome periodJul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027Jul 1, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027
Days left285285
Starting cap+14.3%+18.2%
Can still gainnot publishednot published
Fall before buffer2.1%2.1%
Protection left, index points30.0% of 30.0%10.0% of 10.0%
Index return this period+2.1%+2.1%
Fund return this period+2.0%+2.5%
State todayOpenOpen
Expense ratio0.30%0.30%
Net assets$1m$2m

CTJL in plain words

The fund's price can fall 2.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 30.0% of the 30.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 285 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

JULC in plain words

Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, CTJL or JULC?
CTJL ends its outcome period on Jun 30, 2027 and JULC on Jun 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, CTJL or JULC?
CTJL charges 0.30% a year and JULC charges 0.30%, so CTJL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTJL against JULC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTJL against JULC, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/ctjl-vs-julc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources