CPSY vs PMJA: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 PMJA can fall 4.6% before its buffer engages and CPSY 4.6%. Calamos S&P 500 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - January and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January.
PMJA costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; CPSY is 5.2 times larger.
| CPSY | PMJA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $29m | $6m |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.9% | +6.0% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
CPSY: reference +12.7% since period start, fund +4.3%; buffer −1 to floor; cap +5.9%; At its cap.
PMJA: reference +12.9% since period start, fund +4.3%; buffer Floor; cap +6.6%; At its cap.
Both are already at their cap, so neither gains from more rise in the index before the period ends.
Where each one stands today
CPSY resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 90 days from now; PMJA runs to Dec 31, 2026, 90 days. A fall from here reaches CPSY’s buffer after 4.6% and PMJA’s after 4.6%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPSY | PMJA | CPSY | PMJA |
| 3 months | +1.7% | +1.7% | −1.9 pts | −1.9 pts |
| 6 months | +4.4% | +4.4% | −13.6 pts | −13.5 pts |
| 1 year | +5.9% | +6.0% | −10.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
CPSY and PMJA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
CPSY and PMJA on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CPSY in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +5.9% for the period on Oct 2, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's price can fall 4.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 99.5% of the 99.5% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 90 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
PMJA in plain words
SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +6.6% for the period on Oct 2, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.7% as the period runs out. In index terms, SPY can fall 11.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, CPSY against PMJA, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsy-vs-pmja
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CPSY against PMJA, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsy-vs-pmja Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, CPSY against PMJA, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsy-vs-pmja
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). CPSY against PMJA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsy-vs-pmja
- Markdown
- [CPSY against PMJA (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpsy-vs-pmja)