Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CPST vs XAUG: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Nov 4, 2026 XAUG can fall 1.9% before its buffer engages and CPST 0.6%, and XAUG resets 11 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CPST and XAUG
Net assets: $41m on Nov 4, 2026 for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September, and $26m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August.
CPST: reference +0.7% since period start, fund +0.5%; buffer Floor; cap +8.1%; Full floor. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.XAUG: reference +0.1% since period start, fund +1.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +11.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
XAUG: reference +0.1% since period start, fund +1.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +11.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CPST costs 0.16 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; CPST is 1.6 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CPST | XAUG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.2% | +8.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 0.7% | 0.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $41m | $26m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPST | XAUG | CPST | XAUG |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +1.3% | +1.2 pts | +1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +2.3% | +3.4% | −2.1 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 1 year | +5.2% | +8.3% | −8.4 pts | −5.3 pts |
| 3 years | – | +32.7% | – | −43.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CPST Sep 2024 · XAUG Aug 2023 | +14.1% | +33.9% | −24.8 pts | −40.6 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. CPST is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. XAUG is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
XAUG resets first, on Aug 20, 2027, 289 days from now; CPST runs to Aug 31, 2027, 300 days. A fall from here reaches CPST’s buffer after 0.6% and XAUG’s after 1.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CPST
The fund's price can fall 0.6% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 300 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Aug 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
XAUG
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 9.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 289 days remained on Nov 4, 2026. On Aug 20, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CPST against XAUG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpst-vs-xaug
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CPST against XAUG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpst-vs-xaug
[CPST against XAUG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpst-vs-xaug)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.