CPRO vs KOCT: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 23, 2026 CPRO can fall 0.2% before its buffer engages and KOCT 0.0%. Net assets on Oct 23, 2026: $25m for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - October and $168m for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - Oct.
CPRO costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.9 points; KOCT is 6.7 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| CPRO | KOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $25m | $168m |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.9% | +12.8% |
| What it tracks | IWM | IWM |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
CPRO: reference −1.2% since period start, fund +0.2%; buffer Floor; cap +10.2%; Buffer working. Figures to Oct 23, 2026.
Figures to Oct 23, 2026.
KOCT: reference −0.8% since period start, fund −0.3%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +18.8%; Buffer working. Figures to Oct 23, 2026.
KOCT: reference −0.8% since period start, fund −0.3%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +18.8%; Buffer working. Figures to Oct 23, 2026.
These are two different products. CPRO is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. KOCT is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
CPRO resets first, on Sep 30, 2027, 342 days from now; KOCT runs to Sep 30, 2027, 342 days. A fall from here reaches CPRO’s buffer after 0.2% and KOCT’s after 0.0%. Both track IWM, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPRO | KOCT | CPRO | KOCT |
| 3 months | +1.4% | +0.8% | +6.7 pts | +6.1 pts |
| 6 months | +3.4% | +4.9% | +3.7 pts | +5.2 pts |
| 1 year | +6.9% | +12.8% | −5.0 pts | +0.9 pts |
| 3 years | – | +51.5% | – | −14.1 pts |
| Since launch Not the same days: CPRO Oct 2024 · KOCT Oct 2019 | +15.8% | +56.6% | −10.7 pts | −29.3 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. – means no data for this window, usually because the fund is younger than it. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 23, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CPRO
The fund's price can fall 0.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, IWM can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 98.8% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 342 days remained on Oct 23, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About KOCT
From its price on Oct 23, 2026, the fund can gain about 19.1% more before it reaches its cap. Protection left, in index points: 14.2% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CPRO against KOCT, data as of Oct 23, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpro-vs-koct
ETFIQ. (Oct 23, 2026). CPRO against KOCT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpro-vs-koct
[CPRO against KOCT (ETFIQ, Oct 23, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpro-vs-koct)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.