CPRO vs KOCT: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 KOCT can fall 0.5% before its buffer engages and CPRO 0.4%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $25m for Calamos Russell 2000 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - October and $167m for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - Oct.
CPRO costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.4 points; KOCT is 6.6 times larger.
| CPRO | KOCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $25m | $167m |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.3% | +13.7% |
| What it tracks | IWM | IWM |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
CPRO: reference 0.0% since period start, fund +0.4%; buffer Floor; cap +10.2%; Buffer working. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
KOCT: reference +0.4% since period start, fund +0.5%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +18.8%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
KOCT: reference +0.4% since period start, fund +0.5%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +18.8%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
These are two different products. CPRO is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. KOCT is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
CPRO resets first, on Sep 30, 2027, 356 days from now; KOCT runs to Sep 30, 2027, 356 days. A fall from here reaches CPRO’s buffer after 0.4% and KOCT’s after 0.5%. Both track IWM, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CPRO | KOCT | CPRO | KOCT |
| 3 months | +1.8% | +1.0% | +7.5 pts | +6.8 pts |
| 6 months | +4.5% | +8.0% | −2.2 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 1 year | +7.3% | +13.7% | −6.5 pts | −0.1 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +47.4% | not published | −11.1 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CPRO in plain words
The fund's price can fall 0.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, IWM can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 356 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Sep 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
KOCT in plain words
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 18.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, IWM can fall 0.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, CPRO against KOCT, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpro-vs-koct
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CPRO against KOCT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpro-vs-koct
[CPRO against KOCT (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cpro-vs-koct)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.