CJUL vs JULU: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 13, 2026 CJUL can fall 4.2% before its buffer engages and JULU 3.1%. Net assets on Oct 13, 2026: $1m for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and $80m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Jul.
CJUL costs 0.44 points a year less; JULU is far larger, $80m against $1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| CJUL | JULU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.74% |
| Net assets | $1m | $80m |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +12.8% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 4.2% | 4.0% |
CJUL: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
CJUL: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
JULU: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +2.5%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
A percentile among the 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Where each one stands today
CJUL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 260 days from now; JULU runs to Jun 30, 2027, 260 days. A fall from here reaches CJUL’s buffer after 4.2% and JULU’s after 3.1%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CJUL | JULU | CJUL | JULU |
| 3 months | +2.8% | +2.0% | −0.7 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +9.8% | not published | −2.3 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +12.8% | not published | −4.5 pts |
| Since launch Not the same days: CJUL Jul 2026 · JULU Jul 2024 | +3.4% | +30.9% | −1.1 pts | −11.7 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CJUL
The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 260 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About JULU
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 3.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CJUL against JULU, data as of Oct 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-julu
ETFIQ. (Oct 13, 2026). CJUL against JULU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-julu
[CJUL against JULU (ETFIQ, Oct 13, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-julu)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.