CJUL vs JULP: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 CJUL can fall 4.2% before its buffer engages and JULP 3.8%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $1m for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and $38m for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July.
CJUL costs 0.20 points a year less; JULP is far larger, $38m against $1m.
| CJUL | JULP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.50% |
| Net assets | $1m | $38m |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +11.7% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 4.2% | 4.1% |
CJUL: reference +4.4% since period start, fund +3.7%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
CJUL: reference +4.4% since period start, fund +3.7%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
JULP: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.5%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +16.2%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
JULP: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.5%; buffer 0 to −12; cap +16.2%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
A percentile among the 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Where each one stands today
CJUL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 264 days from now; JULP runs to Jun 30, 2027, 264 days. A fall from here reaches CJUL’s buffer after 4.2% and JULP’s after 3.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CJUL | JULP | CJUL | JULP |
| 3 months | +2.6% | +2.8% | −0.6 pts | −0.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +8.2% | not published | −6.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +11.7% | not published | −4.3 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CJUL in plain words
The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 264 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
JULP in plain words
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 11.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 12.0% of the 12.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, CJUL against JULP, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-julp
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). CJUL against JULP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-julp
[CJUL against JULP (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-julp)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.