Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CJUL vs DDFL: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
DDFL can fall 2.8% before its buffer engages as of Nov 4, 2026, and CJUL 1.1% as of Nov 3, 2026.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CJUL and DDFL
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $1.0m for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and $160m for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Jul.
CJUL: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.
CJUL: reference +1.2% since period start, fund +2.1%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 3, 2026.DDFL: reference +2.6% since period start, fund +2.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +10.9%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
CJUL costs 0.49 points a year less; DDFL is far larger, $160m against $1.0m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CJUL | DDFL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +7.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 1.1% | 2.6% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $1.0m | $160m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CJUL | DDFL | CJUL | DDFL |
| 3 months | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | – | +3.5% | – | −1.0 pts |
| 1 year | – | +7.3% | – | −6.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: CJUL Jul 2026 · DDFL Jul 2025 | +2.8% | +10.8% | −0.1 pts | −13.3 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. – means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
These are two different products. DDFL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CJUL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
DDFL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 238 days from now; CJUL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 239 days. A fall from here reaches CJUL’s buffer after 1.1% and DDFL’s after 2.8%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
CJUL
The fund's price can fall 1.1% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.1% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 239 days remained on Nov 3, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
DDFL
From its price on Nov 4, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.8% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 2.6% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. 238 days remained on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CJUL against DDFL, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-ddfl
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CJUL against DDFL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-ddfl
[CJUL against DDFL (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-ddfl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.