CJUL vs DDFL: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 13, 2026 CJUL can fall 4.2% before its buffer engages and DDFL 2.9%. Net assets on Oct 13, 2026: $1m for Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series and $159m for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - Jul.
CJUL costs 0.49 points a year less; DDFL is far larger, $159m against $1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| CJUL | DDFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $1m | $159m |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +7.7% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 4.2% | 4.0% |
CJUL: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
CJUL: reference +4.3% since period start, fund +3.6%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +14.0%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
DDFL: reference +4.2% since period start, fund +2.7%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +10.9%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
These are two different products. DDFL is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. CJUL is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
CJUL resets first, on Jun 30, 2027, 260 days from now; DDFL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 260 days. A fall from here reaches CJUL’s buffer after 4.2% and DDFL’s after 2.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CJUL | DDFL | CJUL | DDFL |
| 3 months | +2.8% | +2.0% | −0.7 pts | −1.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +4.2% | not published | −7.9 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +7.7% | not published | −9.7 pts |
| Since launch Not the same days: CJUL Jul 2026 · DDFL Jul 2025 | +3.4% | +10.8% | −1.1 pts | −15.2 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CJUL
The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 260 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
About DDFL
From its price on Oct 13, 2026, the fund can gain about 7.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CJUL against DDFL, data as of Oct 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-ddfl
ETFIQ. (Oct 13, 2026). CJUL against DDFL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-ddfl
[CJUL against DDFL (ETFIQ, Oct 13, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/cjul-vs-ddfl)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.