Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BJUL vs DAPR: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 28, 2026 DAPR can fall 10.5% before its buffer engages and BJUL 3.2%, and DAPR resets 75 days sooner.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BJUL and DAPR
Net assets: $362m on Oct 28, 2026 for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - Jul, and $336m on Oct 27, 2026 for FT Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - April.
BJUL: reference +3.3% since period start, fund +3.0%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
BJUL: reference +3.3% since period start, fund +3.0%; buffer 0 to −9; cap +18.1%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.DAPR: reference +8.8% since period start, fund +5.2%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +12.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.
DAPR: reference +8.8% since period start, fund +5.2%; buffer −5 to −30; cap +12.0%; Between buffer and cap. Data to Oct 28, 2026.Pair scorecard
BJUL costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points; BJUL is 1.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BJUL | DAPR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.0% | +8.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Index fall to the buffer | 3.2% | 12.7% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $361m | $336m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
How much of a bear-market fall the buffer would absorb from today's level, ranked against 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. 100 is best. How it is computed
A percentile among the 292 buffer ETFs on stocks with a live outcome period. Today's position against one 20% fall; it ignores smaller falls, and stock buffers are never ranked against bond or commodity ones. All buffer ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Apr 30, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 286 weekly returns · each against SPYBJUL returned more: +77.5% to +38.8%. DAPR swung less: 7.3% to 10.7%. DAPR fell less at its worst: −10.0% to −13.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BJUL | DAPR | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +77.5% | +38.8% | BJUL | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +11.0% | +6.1% | BJUL | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +77.5% | +38.8% | BJUL | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 10.7% | 7.3% | DAPR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 7.0% | 5.3% | DAPR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −13.0% | −10.0% | DAPR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 57.2% | 29.4% | 100.0% | BJUL | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 71.0% | 46.6% | 100.0% | DAPR | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.66 | 0.42 | 1.00 | DAPR lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.94 | 0.83 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.69 | 0.36 | BJUL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.06 | 0.50 | BJUL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.113 | 0.063 | 0.099 | BJUL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.85 | 0.61 | BJUL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.9% a year | −1.5% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.80 | −1.18 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −1.3% to +3.1% | −4.1% to +1.0% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.41 | −0.76 | BJUL | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 6.0% | 9.6% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 286 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BJUL | DAPR | BJUL | DAPR |
| 3 months | +4.4% | +3.6% | −1.5 pts | −2.3 pts |
| 6 months | +6.2% | +5.3% | −2.3 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 1 year | +11.0% | +8.3% | −1.4 pts | −4.1 pts |
| 3 years | +67.2% | +42.1% | −20.9 pts | −46.0 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: BJUL Aug 2018 · DAPR Apr 2021 | +118.1% | +40.2% | −46.9 pts | −45.8 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
They do not reset together. DAPR has 170 days of its period left and BJUL has 245, so the two are not the same bet on the same months.
Where each one stands today
DAPR resets first, on Apr 16, 2027, 170 days from now; BJUL runs to Jun 30, 2027, 245 days. BJUL can still gain 14.4% before its cap, DAPR 5.7%. A fall from here reaches BJUL’s buffer after 3.2% and DAPR’s after 10.5%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
BJUL and DAPR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Protection and cap. BJUL: Absorbs the first 9% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 18.1%, over a period ending Jun 30, 2027. DAPR: Absorbs losses from 5.0% to 30.0% on SPY and caps the gain at 12.0%, over a period ending Apr 16, 2027. The starting caps are 6.1 points apart.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BJUL returned +11.0% and DAPR +8.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.7 points.
- Outcome period (similar). BJUL runs Jun 30, 2026 to Jun 30, 2027 with 245 days left; DAPR runs Apr 20, 2026 to Apr 16, 2027 with 170 days left.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BJUL
From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 3.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 9.0% of the 9.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 245 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
DAPR
From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 10.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, SPY can fall 12.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 25.0% of the 25.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 170 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Apr 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
ETFIQ calculates every number from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BJUL against DAPR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/bjul-vs-dapr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BJUL against DAPR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/bjul-vs-dapr
[BJUL against DAPR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/bjul-vs-dapr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.