BALT vs ZALT: which one stands where?
As of Oct 2, 2026 ZALT can fall 0.4% before its buffer engages and BALT 0.2%. Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF - Quarterly and Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly.
their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; BALT is 3.8 times larger.
| BALT | ZALT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.69% | 0.69% |
| Net assets | $3.1bn | $808m |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.5% | +8.5% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
BALT: reference +0.9% since period start, fund +0.2%; buffer 0 to −20; cap +2.4%; Between buffer and cap.
ZALT: reference +0.9% since period start, fund +0.4%; buffer 0 to −10; cap +3.6%; Between buffer and cap.
A percentile among the 294 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Both are Innovator funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
BALT resets first, on Dec 31, 2026, 90 days from now; ZALT runs to Dec 31, 2026, 90 days. BALT can still gain 2.3% before its cap, ZALT 3.2%. A fall from here reaches BALT’s buffer after 0.2% and ZALT’s after 0.4%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BALT | ZALT | BALT | ZALT |
| 3 months | +2.1% | +2.4% | −1.5 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +4.4% | +6.1% | −13.6 pts | −11.8 pts |
| 1 year | +6.5% | +8.5% | −9.7 pts | −7.7 pts |
| 3 years | +26.1% | +36.3% | −63.2 pts | −53.0 pts |
BALT and ZALT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
BALT and ZALT on the same fields, as of Oct 2, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BALT in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 2.3% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 0.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 20.0% of the 20.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 90 days remained on Oct 2, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.
ZALT in plain words
From its price on Oct 2, 2026, the fund can gain about 3.2% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, BALT against ZALT, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-zalt
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BALT against ZALT, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-zalt Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms. The underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, BALT against ZALT, data as of Oct 2, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-zalt
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Oct 2, 2026). BALT against ZALT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-zalt
- Markdown
- [BALT against ZALT (ETFIQ, Oct 2, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/balt-vs-zalt)