AUGU vs JULM: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 13, 2026 AUGU can fall 3.4% before its buffer engages and JULM 2.2%, and JULM resets 15 days sooner. Net assets on Oct 12, 2026: $41m for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped ETF - Aug and $36m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - July.
AUGU costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.7 points; AUGU is 1.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| AUGU | JULM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.85% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $41m | $36m |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +6.1% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 3.9% | 4.4% |
AUGU: reference +4.0% since period start, fund +2.7%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
AUGU: reference +4.0% since period start, fund +2.7%; buffer 0 to −15; no cap; No cap. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
JULM: reference +4.6% since period start, fund +1.3%; buffer Floor; cap +7.3%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
Figures to Oct 13, 2026.
These are two different products. JULM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. AUGU is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Where each one stands today
JULM resets first, on Jul 16, 2027, 276 days from now; AUGU runs to Jul 31, 2027, 291 days. A fall from here reaches AUGU’s buffer after 3.4% and JULM’s after 2.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AUGU | JULM | AUGU | JULM |
| 3 months | +2.4% | +1.3% | −1.5 pts | −2.5 pts |
| 6 months | +10.4% | +3.4% | −3.0 pts | −10.0 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +6.1% | −5.4 pts | −13.1 pts |
| Since launch Not the same days: AUGU Aug 2024 · JULM Jul 2024 | +31.2% | +15.8% | −12.1 pts | −28.8 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About AUGU
This fund has no cap. It takes a share of any further rise in SPY. The fund's price can fall 3.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 291 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jul 31, 2027 the period ends and new terms are set.
About JULM
From its price on Oct 13, 2026, the fund can gain about 5.1% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 4.4% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 276 days remained on Oct 13, 2026. On Jul 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AUGU against JULM, data as of Oct 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augu-vs-julm
ETFIQ. (Oct 13, 2026). AUGU against JULM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augu-vs-julm
[AUGU against JULM (ETFIQ, Oct 13, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augu-vs-julm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.