AUGM vs XAUG: Cap, Buffer & Days Left
As of Oct 9, 2026 XAUG can fall 2.2% before its buffer engages and AUGM 1.5%. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $66m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - August and $26m for FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - August.
Both cost 0.85% a year; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points; AUGM is 2.5 times larger.
| AUGM | XAUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.85% | 0.85% |
| Net assets | $66m | $26m |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.7% | +8.6% |
| What it tracks | SPY | SPY |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| Index fall to the buffer | 1.7% | |
AUGM: reference +1.7% since period start, fund +0.7%; buffer Floor; cap +8.0%; Full floor. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
XAUG: reference +1.7% since period start, fund +1.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +11.1%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
XAUG: reference +1.7% since period start, fund +1.4%; buffer 0 to −15; cap +11.1%; Between buffer and cap. Figures to Oct 9, 2026.
These are two different products. AUGM is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. XAUG is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.
Both are First Trust funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.
Where each one stands today
AUGM resets first, on Aug 20, 2027, 315 days from now; XAUG runs to Aug 20, 2027, 315 days. AUGM can still gain 6.4% before its cap, XAUG 8.8%. A fall from here reaches AUGM’s buffer after 1.5% and XAUG’s after 2.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Gap to the reference's price return | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AUGM | XAUG | AUGM | XAUG |
| 3 months | +1.3% | +1.9% | −1.9 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +3.8% | +5.5% | −10.8 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 1 year | +5.7% | +8.6% | −10.3 pts | −7.4 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +33.7% | not published | −45.5 pts |
Each fund's gap is to its reference's price return, dividends left out: the basis the outcome period uses. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AUGM in plain words
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 6.4% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 1.5% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 1.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 315 days remained on Oct 9, 2026. On Aug 20, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.
XAUG in plain words
From its price on Oct 9, 2026, the fund can gain about 8.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 2.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
ETFIQ calculates every figure from each issuer’s published outcome-period terms. Buffer ETFs hold options on an index, not shares, so there is no holdings overlap to report.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, AUGM against XAUG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augm-vs-xaug
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). AUGM against XAUG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augm-vs-xaug
[AUGM against XAUG (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/augm-vs-xaug)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.