Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APXM vs XAPR: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 XAPR can fall 5.2% before its buffer engages and APXM 3.2%.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April and FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April.

3.2%APXM can fall this far before its buffer
5.2%XAPR can fall this far before its buffer
3.7%APXM can still gain
4.8%XAPR can still gain
APXMAt its cap
50.1 pts of buffer+7% gained−50.1% floor0% period start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +9.0%50.1 pts of buffer−50.1% floor0% start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +9.0%
XAPRBetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer+9% gained−15.0% floor0% period start+10.4% capTODAY · SPY +9.0%15 pts+9%−15.0% floor0% start+10.4% capTODAY · SPY +9.0%

These are two different products. XAPR is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. APXM is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Both are First Trust funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

APXM resets first, on Apr 16, 2027, 207 days from now; XAPR runs to Apr 16, 2027, 207 days. APXM can still gain 3.7% before its cap, XAPR 4.8%. A fall from here reaches APXM’s buffer after 3.2% and XAPR’s after 5.2%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

APXM and XAPR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
APXMXAPRAPXMXAPR
3 months+1.3%+2.1%−1.0 pts−0.2 pts
6 months+2.6%+4.8%−15.4 pts−13.2 pts
1 year+4.8%+7.6%−11.8 pts−8.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APXM and XAPR on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APXM
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April
Absorbs the first 50% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.0%, over a period ending Apr 16, 2027
XAPR
FT Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 10.4%, over a period ending Apr 16, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustFirst Trust
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer50%15%
Outcome periodApr 20, 2026 to Apr 16, 2027Apr 20, 2026 to Apr 16, 2027
Days left207207
Starting cap+7.0%+10.4%
Can still gain3.7%4.8%
Fall before buffer3.2%5.2%
Protection left, index points50.1% of 50.1%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+9.0%+9.0%
Fund return this period+2.4%+4.5%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.85%
Net assets$21m$30m

APXM in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.0% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 8.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 50.1% of the 50.1% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 207 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Apr 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

XAPR in plain words

From its price on Sep 21, 2026, the fund can gain about 4.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 5.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, APXM or XAPR?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, APXM can gain about 3.7% before its cap and XAPR about 4.8%, so XAPR has more room left this period.
Which resets first, APXM or XAPR?
APXM ends its outcome period on Apr 16, 2027 and XAPR on Apr 16, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, APXM or XAPR?
APXM charges 0.85% a year and XAPR charges 0.85%, so APXM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APXM against XAPR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APXM against XAPR, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/apxm-vs-xapr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources