Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APXM vs CMAY: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 CMAY can fall 5.7% before its buffer engages and APXM 3.2%, and APXM resets 17 days sooner.

FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April and Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series.

ETFIQ Downside Cover Score: APXM scores higher

If the market falls into a bear market from here, how much does the buffer absorb?

APXM 95.4CMAY 74.20.2, the lowest in this set99.8, the highest

A percentile among the 293 buffer ETFs with a live outcome period. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All buffer ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

APXMAt its cap
50.1 pts of buffer+7% gained−50.1% floor0% period start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +9.0%50.1 pts of buffer−50.1% floor0% start+7.0% capTODAY · SPY +9.0%
CMAYBetween buffer and cap
15 pts of buffer+6%−15.0% floor0% period start+11.0% capTODAY · SPY +6.0%15 pts−15.0% floor0% start+11.0% capTODAY · SPY +6.0%

Where each one stands today

APXM resets first, on Apr 16, 2027, 207 days from now; CMAY runs to Apr 30, 2027, 224 days. A fall from here reaches APXM’s buffer after 3.2% and CMAY’s after 5.7%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

APXM and CMAY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
APXMCMAYAPXMCMAY
3 months+1.3%+1.3%−1.0 pts−0.9 pts
6 months+2.6%not published−15.4 ptsnot published
1 year+4.8%not published−11.8 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APXM and CMAY on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APXM
FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April
Absorbs the first 50% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 7.0%, over a period ending Apr 16, 2027
CMAY
Corgi U.S. Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series
Absorbs the first 15% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 11.0%, over a period ending Apr 30, 2027
IssuerFirst TrustCorgi
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer50%15%
Outcome periodApr 20, 2026 to Apr 16, 2027May 1, 2026 to Apr 30, 2027
Days left207224
Starting cap+7.0%+11.0%
Can still gain3.7%not published
Fall before buffer3.2%5.7%
Protection left, index points50.1% of 50.1%15.0% of 15.0%
Index return this period+9.0%+6.0%
Fund return this period+2.4%+4.1%
State todayAt capOpen
Expense ratio0.85%0.30%
Net assets$21m$2m

APXM in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.0% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 3.7% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 8.2% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 50.1% of the 50.1% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 207 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Apr 16, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

CMAY in plain words

The fund's price can fall 5.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 5.7% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 224 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Apr 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which resets first, APXM or CMAY?
APXM ends its outcome period on Apr 16, 2027 and CMAY on Apr 30, 2027. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, APXM or CMAY?
APXM charges 0.85% a year and CMAY charges 0.30%, so CMAY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APXM against CMAY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APXM against CMAY, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/apxm-vs-cmay Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources