Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

APOC vs ZALT: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 APOC can fall 3.3% before its buffer engages and ZALT 2.9%.

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct and Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly.

3.3%APOC can fall this far before its buffer
2.9%ZALT can fall this far before its buffer
0.0%APOC can still gain
0.6%ZALT can still gain
APOCAt its cap
full floor beneathfull floor0% period start+3.4% capTODAY · SPY +19.0%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+3.4% capTODAY · SPY +19.0%
ZALTAt its cap
10 pts−10.0% floor0% period start+3.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%−10.0% floor0% start+3.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. APOC is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. ZALT is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Both are Innovator funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

APOC resets first, on Sep 30, 2026, 9 days from now; ZALT runs to Sep 30, 2026, 9 days. APOC can still gain 0.0% before its cap, ZALT 0.6%. A fall from here reaches APOC’s buffer after 3.3% and ZALT’s after 2.9%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

APOC and ZALT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
APOCZALTAPOCZALT
3 months+1.3%+2.0%−0.9 pts−0.3 pts
6 months+2.6%+6.5%−15.4 pts−11.5 pts
1 year+2.7%+8.5%−13.8 pts−8.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
APOC and ZALT on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
APOC
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 6 Mo Apr/Oct
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 3.4%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
ZALT
Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Absorbs the first 10% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 3.6%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer100%10%
Outcome periodMar 31, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026
Days left99
Starting cap+3.4%+3.6%
Can still gain0.0%0.6%
Fall before buffer3.3%2.9%
Protection left, index points100.0% of 100.0%10.0% of 10.0%
Index return this period+19.0%+3.6%
Fund return this period+3.0%+2.8%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.79%0.69%
Net assets$70m$789m

APOC in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +3.4% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 16.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 9 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

ZALT in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +3.6% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.6% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 2.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 10.0% of the 10.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, APOC or ZALT?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, APOC can gain about 0.0% before its cap and ZALT about 0.6%, so ZALT has more room left this period.
Which resets first, APOC or ZALT?
APOC ends its outcome period on Sep 30, 2026 and ZALT on Sep 30, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, APOC or ZALT?
APOC charges 0.79% a year and ZALT charges 0.69%, so ZALT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

APOC against ZALT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, APOC against ZALT, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/apoc-vs-zalt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources