Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AOCT vs DDSQ: which one stands where?

As of Sep 21, 2026 AOCT can fall 11.7% before its buffer engages and DDSQ 3.0%.

Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - Oct 2026 and Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly.

11.7%AOCT can fall this far before its buffer
3.0%DDSQ can fall this far before its buffer
0.0%AOCT can still gain
0.5%DDSQ can still gain
AOCTAt its cap
full floor beneath+13%full floor0% period start+13.0% capTODAY · SPY +34.9%full floor beneathfull floor0% start+13.0% capTODAY · SPY +34.9%
DDSQAt its cap
−5.0% floor0% period start+3.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%−5.0% floor0% start+3.6% capTODAY · SPY +3.6%

These are two different products. AOCT is a floor fund, which caps how far a holder can fall. DDSQ is a buffer fund, which absorbs the first part of a fall and leaves everything below it with the holder.

Both are Innovator funds, so the difference between them is the terms rather than the house.

Where each one stands today

AOCT resets first, on Sep 30, 2026, 9 days from now; DDSQ runs to Sep 30, 2026, 9 days. AOCT can still gain 0.0% before its cap, DDSQ 0.5%. A fall from here reaches AOCT’s buffer after 11.7% and DDSQ’s after 3.0%. Both track SPY, so what separates them is where each is in its own period.

Every figure is ETFIQ’s own, from the issuer’s published outcome-period terms. A buffer ETF holds FLEX options on its reference index rather than shares, so there is no holdings overlap between two of them to report.

Performance, window by window

AOCT and DDSQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnGap to the reference
AOCTDDSQAOCTDDSQ
3 months+1.2%+2.2%−1.0 pts−0.1 pts
6 months+4.7%+12.9%−13.3 pts−5.1 pts
1 year+5.5%not published−11.1 ptsnot published
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AOCT and DDSQ on the same fields, as of Sep 21, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AOCT
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - Oct 2026
Absorbs the whole loss on SPY and caps the gain at 13.0%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
DDSQ
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
Absorbs the first 5% of loss on SPY and caps the gain at 3.6%, over a period ending Sep 30, 2026
IssuerInnovatorInnovator
Reference indexSPYSPY
Buffer100%5%
Outcome periodSep 30, 2024 to Sep 30, 2026Jun 30, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026
Days left99
Starting cap+13.0%+3.6%
Can still gain0.0%0.5%
Fall before buffer11.7%3.0%
Protection left, index points100.0% of 100.0%5.0% of 5.0%
Index return this period+34.9%+3.6%
Fund return this period+11.3%+2.9%
State todayAt capAt cap
Expense ratio0.79%0.79%
Net assets$48m$90m

AOCT in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +13.0% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 11.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 25.9% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level. 9 days remained on Sep 21, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

DDSQ in plain words

SPY had already risen past this fund's cap of +3.6% for the period on Sep 21, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 0.5% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 3.0% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, SPY can fall 3.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 5.0% of the 5.0% buffer still sits below today's SPY level.

Questions people ask

Which has more room to gain, AOCT or DDSQ?
From their prices on Sep 21, 2026, AOCT can gain about 0.0% before its cap and DDSQ about 0.5%, so DDSQ has more room left this period.
Which resets first, AOCT or DDSQ?
AOCT ends its outcome period on Sep 30, 2026 and DDSQ on Sep 30, 2026. A new cap is set the day after each.
Which is cheaper, AOCT or DDSQ?
AOCT charges 0.79% a year and DDSQ charges 0.79%, so AOCT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AOCT against DDSQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AOCT against DDSQ, data as of Sep 21, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/buffer/aoct-vs-ddsq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources