Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VPL vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VPL returned +24.8% to XLG's +6.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VPL and XLG

Net assets: $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.07%
VPL expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.4 points.

VPL vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVPLXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.8%+6.4%
Drawdown
Below its high7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap IndexS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.07%0.20%
Net assets, VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026$9.0bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund24.8%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, VPL and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VPL XLG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Only in XLG
NVIDIA Corp 12.54%
Apple Inc 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 9.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Pacific Stock Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +24.8% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark not measured −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.07% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 98.4%
Holdings 2343 53
Net assets, VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 $9.0bn $11.9bn

VPL and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VPL or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VPL returned +24.8% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, VPL or XLG?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VPL and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of VPL and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VPL against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vpl-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.