Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
VOO vs XTR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, VOO returned +14.8% to XTR's +10.2%, and VOO charges 0.03% to XTR's 0.25%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about VOO and XTR
Net assets: $1.0tn on Oct 31, 2026 for Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, and $5.0m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF.
Pair scorecard
VOO costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points.
| Measure | VOO | XTR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +10.2% |
| Total return, 52 weeks | +9.9% | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | S&P 500 Index | not published |
| Treasury bills, 52 weeks | +3.7% | |
| Against cash | 6.3 points ahead | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.25% |
| Net assets, VOO as of Oct 31, 2026 and XTR as of Oct 12, 2026 | $1.0tn | $5.0m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Holdings dated | Sep 30, 2026 | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.1% | |
| Risk | ||
| Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns | +1.00 | |
| Beta to the S&P 500 | +0.94: about 0.94% for each 1% | |
| Its average week when the S&P 500 fell | fell 1.07% | |
| Down-week capture | 100.0% | |
| Weeks the S&P 500 fell | 26 of 52, by 1.07% on average | |
Risk and return
Sep 3, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026 · 269 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: VOO against IVV, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 30, 2026; XTR against VOO, Sep 3, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Sep 2021 to Oct 2026, VOO returned more: +79.5% to +54.0%. XTR swung less: 13.7% to 16.0%. XTR fell less at its worst: −20.3% to −23.9%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | VOO | XTR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +79.5% | +54.0% | VOO | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +12.0% | +8.7% | VOO | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +66.8% | +3.2% | VOO | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.0% | 13.7% | XTR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 10.8% | 9.2% | XTR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −23.9% | −20.3% | XTR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.8% | 80.3% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 99.9% | 93.3% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 1.00 | 0.83 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 0.94 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.55 | 0.40 | VOO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.82 | 0.59 | VOO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.133 | 0.066 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.50 | 0.43 | VOO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IVV | VOO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | 0.0% a year | −1.8% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.50 | −1.28 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.1% to +0.2% | −4.6% to +1.0% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.02 | −0.79 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 0.4% | 4.2% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 269 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
Side by side
VOO and XTR on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
VOO
VOO tracks the S&P 500. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%.
XTR
XTR is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +1.00 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.94, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.94% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks XTR fell 1.07% on average, a down-week capture of 100.0%. Over the same 52 weeks XTR returned +9.9% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 6.3 percentage points ahead of cash.
Questions people ask
- Are VOO and XTR in the same category?
- VOO is a stock ETF and XTR is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, VOO or XTR?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VOO returned +14.8% and XTR +10.2%.
- Which is cheaper, VOO or XTR?
- VOO is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, VOO against XTR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/voo-vs-xtr
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). VOO against XTR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/voo-vs-xtr
[VOO against XTR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/voo-vs-xtr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.