Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
VONG vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VONG returned +1.1% to VTWO's +14.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about VONG and VTWO
Net assets on Sep 30, 2026: $47.1bn for Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF and $16.6bn for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.06% a year; their one-year returns differ by 13.2 points; VONG is 2.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | VONG | VTWO |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +1.1% | +14.3% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Growth Index | Russell 2000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.06% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $47.1bn | $16.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.6% | 5.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026 · 838 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: VONG against IWF, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026; VTWO against IWM, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.
VONG returned more: +1,017.5% to +409.2%. VONG swung less: 17.9% to 21.0%. VONG fell less at its worst: −32.5% to −40.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | VONG | VTWO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +1,017.5% | +409.2% | VONG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.2% | +10.6% | VONG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +840.0% | +315.9% | VONG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 17.9% | 21.0% | VONG | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.0% | 14.5% | VONG | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −32.5% | −40.2% | VONG | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 99.9% | 98.8% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 99.8% | 99.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.99 | 0.99 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 1.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.84 | 0.51 | VONG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.25 | 0.74 | VONG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.151 | 0.108 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.50 | 0.26 | VONG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IWF | IWM | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.2% a year | +0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.76 | 0.46 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.3% to +0.7% | −0.4% to +0.6% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.11 | 0.02 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 1.0% | 1.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 838 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, VONG and VTWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
VONG and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
VONG and VTWO do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. VONG follows Russell 1000 Growth Index and VTWO follows Russell 2000 Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VONG returned +1.1% and VTWO +14.3% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.2 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
VONG
VONG tracks the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +0.9% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 373 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VTWO
VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, VONG against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vong-vs-vtwo
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). VONG against VTWO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vong-vs-vtwo
[VONG against VTWO (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vong-vs-vtwo)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.