Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VDE vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VDE returned +58.8% to XLG's +6.4%; 3% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VDE and XLG

Net assets: $10.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Energy ETF, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+58.8%
VDE total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.09%
VDE expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VDE costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 52.4 points.

VDE vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVDEXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+58.8%+6.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Energy 25/50S&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.20%
Net assets, VDE as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026$10.4bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common3%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund67.1%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

3%

By the books each fund has filed, VDE and XLG hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

3% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VDE XLG
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 22.88% 1.76%
Chevron Corp 14.42% 1.07%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VDE
ConocoPhillips 5.87%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 4.46%
Valero Energy Corp 4.45%
Phillips 66 3.94%
Williams Cos Inc 3.16%
EOG Resources Inc 2.85%
SLB Ltd 2.83%
Kinder Morgan Inc 2.23%
Only in XLG
NVIDIA Corp 12.54%
Apple Inc 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 9.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VDE Vanguard Energy ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Energy Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +58.8% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +59.0% (FENY) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −0.2 pts vs FENY −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 81.2% 98.4%
Holdings 113 53
Net assets, VDE as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 $10.4bn $11.9bn

VDE and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VDE

VDE tracks an index of Energy. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +58.8% with distributions reinvested, against +59.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Energy 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 113 positions, with the top ten at 67.1%.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VDE or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDE returned +58.8% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, VDE or XLG?
VDE is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VDE and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of VDE and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VDE against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vde-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.