Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

VDC vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, VDC returned +12.7% to XLG's +6.4%; 5% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about VDC and XLG

Net assets: $7.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF, and $11.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+12.7%
VDC total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.09%
VDC expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VDC costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.3 points.

VDC vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVDCXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+6.4%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Oct 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50S&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.09%0.20%
Net assets, VDC as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026$7.4bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common5%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund66.0%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 20, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,118 weekly returns
VDC XLG
Return
Total return edge XLG +595.9% +882.5%
Annualized edge XLG +9.4% +11.2%
Price return edge XLG +322.5% +572.4%
Risk
Volatility edge VDC 13.4% 17.0%
Max drawdown edge VDC −32.7% −51.7%
Downside capture 99.6% 98.5%
Beta 1.00 0.95
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.61 0.61
Sortino edge XLG (slight) 0.85 0.87
Treynor 0.075 0.108
Calmar edge VDC 0.29 0.22
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.1% a year +0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.27 0.68
Information ratio 0.04 0.02
Tracking error 0.7% 3.8%

Each against its own benchmark: VDC against FSTA, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; XLG against IVV, May 20, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

XLG returned more: +882.5% to +595.9%. VDC swung less: 13.4% to 17.0%. VDC fell less at its worst: −32.7% to −51.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: VDC vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureVDCXLGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+595.9%+882.5%XLGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+9.4%+11.2%XLGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+322.5%+572.4%XLGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility13.4%17.0%VDCSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.5%11.8%VDCLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−32.7%−51.7%VDCDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture99.4%97.7%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture99.6%98.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.000.95Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared1.000.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.610.61TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.850.87XLG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0750.108Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.290.22VDCAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkFSTAIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.1% a year+0.5% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.270.68Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.3% to +0.4%−1.0% to +2.1%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.040.02Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error0.7%3.8%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,118 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

5%

By the books each fund has filed, VDC and XLG hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

5% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first VDC XLG
Walmart Inc 13.86% 1.26%
Costco Wholesale Corp 12.12% 1.05%
Procter & Gamble Co 9.90% 0.89%
Coca-Cola Co 9.80% 0.84%
Philip Morris International Inc 4.83% 0.75%
PepsiCo Inc 4.28% 0.43%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in VDC
Altria Group Inc 3.86%
Mondelez International Inc 2.58%
Target Corp 2.50%
Colgate-Palmolive Co 2.28%
Monster Beverage Corp 2.08%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 1.48%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 1.41%
Sysco Corp 1.37%
Only in XLG
NVIDIA Corp 12.54%
Apple Inc 12.04%
Microsoft Corp 9.38%
Amazon.com Inc 5.91%
Alphabet Inc 4.47%
Broadcom Inc 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.58%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.25%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Consumer Staples Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +12.7% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +12.7% (FSTA) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs FSTA −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.09% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 86.4% 98.4%
Holdings 105 53
Net assets, VDC as of Sep 30, 2026 and XLG as of Oct 27, 2026 $7.4bn $11.9bn

VDC and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-DCF800FB14

VDC and XLG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. VDC follows MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50 and XLG follows S&P 500 Top 50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 5% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 VDC returned +12.7% and XLG +6.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 6.3 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
VDC

VDC tracks an index of Consumer Staples. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +12.7% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Consumer Staples 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 105 positions, with the top ten at 66.0%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Oct 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, VDC or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, VDC returned +12.7% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, VDC or XLG?
VDC is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do VDC and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 86% of VDC and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, VDC against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/vdc-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.