Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
USFR vs VGT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, USFR returned +4.1% to VGT's +24.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about USFR and VGT
Net assets: $17.0bn on May 31, 2026 for WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund, and $154.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Information Tech ETF.
Pair scorecard
VGT costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.6 points.
| Measure | USFR | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.1% | +24.7% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index | MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50 |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, USFR as of May 31, 2026 and VGT as of Sep 30, 2026 | $17.0bn | $154.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 87% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 63.6% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Feb 14, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026 · 662 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: USFR against TFLO, Feb 14, 2014 to Oct 23, 2026; VGT against FTEC, Nov 1, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.
VGT returned more: +1,085.2% to +29.1%. USFR swung less: 0.9% to 21.5%. USFR fell less at its worst: −1.4% to −34.1%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | USFR | VGT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +29.1% | +1,085.2% | VGT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.0% | +21.4% | VGT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +1.1% | +949.7% | VGT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 0.9% | 21.5% | USFR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 0.6% | 14.2% | USFR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −1.4% | −34.1% | USFR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 67.2% | 100.0% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 0.5% | 99.9% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.01 | 1.00 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.00 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.01 | 0.92 | VGT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.01 | 1.39 | VGT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.006 | 0.201 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 1.49 | 0.63 | USFR | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | TFLO | FTEC | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | 0.0% a year | +0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.02 | 0.80 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −0.5% to +0.5% | −0.2% to +0.5% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | 0.00 | 0.19 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 2.1% | 0.7% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 662 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, USFR and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
USFR and VGT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
USFR
USFR tracks an index of Floating Rate Treasury. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
VGT
VGT tracks an index of Information technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +25.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI US Investable Market Index (IMI)/Information Technology 25/50. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 320 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, USFR or VGT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, USFR returned +4.1% and VGT +24.7%.
- Which is cheaper, USFR or VGT?
- VGT is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, USFR against VGT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/usfr-vs-vgt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). USFR against VGT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/usfr-vs-vgt
[USFR against VGT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/usfr-vs-vgt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.