Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs ZHDG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TLT returned −4.8% to ZHDG's +6.6%, and TLT charges 0.15% to ZHDG's 0.95%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and ZHDG

Net assets: $48.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $35m on Jul 31, 2026 for ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF.

At a glance
−4.8%
TLT total return, 1 year
+6.6%
ZHDG total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.95%
ZHDG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.80 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.4 points.

TLT vs ZHDG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTZHDG
Return
Total return, 1 year−4.8%+6.6%
Total return, 52 weeks+6.3%
Drawdown
Below its high41.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Indexnot published
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash2.6 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.95%
Net assets, TLT as of Nov 3, 2026 and ZHDG as of Jul 31, 2026$48.3bn$35m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.96
Beta to the S&P 500+0.82: about 0.82% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 0.92%
Down-week capture85.6%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF ZHDG ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Alternatives ETF
Issuer iShares Zega
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Hedged equity
Total return, 1 year −4.8% +6.6%
Its benchmark over the same days −4.7% (BBLB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.95%
Holdings 47 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, TLT as of Nov 3, 2026 and ZHDG as of Jul 31, 2026 $48.3bn $35m

TLT and ZHDG on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against −4.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 41.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Nov 4, 2026.

ZHDG

ZHDG is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.96 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +0.82, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 0.82% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks ZHDG fell 0.92% on average, a down-week capture of 85.6%. Over the same 52 weeks ZHDG returned +6.3% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 2.6 percentage points ahead of cash.

Questions people ask

Are TLT and ZHDG in the same category?
TLT is a bond ETF and ZHDG is an alternatives ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, TLT or ZHDG?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −4.8% and ZHDG +6.6%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or ZHDG?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.80 percentage points a year. That is about $80 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against ZHDG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-zhdg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.