Which returned more over the last year, TLT or XLP?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and XLP returned +6.3%, so XLP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, TLT or XLP?

TLT charges 0.15% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

TLT vs XLP: how they differ

TLT and XLP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLP returned more over the year.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and XLP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in TLT	Only in XLP
TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16%	WALMART INC 10.14%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05%	COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 8.76%
TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03%	COCA COLA CO/THE 7.44%
TREASURY BOND 0.02%	PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE 7.29%
	PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 6.47%
	TARGET CORP 4.62%
	COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO 4.53%
	MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC A 4.51%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

TLT and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	XLP State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	20+ year Treasuries	Consumer staples
Total return, 1 year	−6.4%	+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−23.9 pts	−11.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.08%
Holdings	41	36

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 36 positions, with the top ten at 62.5%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or XLP?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and XLP returned +6.3%, so XLP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, TLT or XLP?: TLT charges 0.15% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TLT against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TLT against XLP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-xlp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources