Which returned more over the last year, TLT or XLG?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, TLT or XLG?

TLT charges 0.15% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

TLT vs XLG: how they differ

TLT and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLG returned more over the year.

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in TLT	Only in XLG
TREASURY BOND (2OLD) 4.16%	NVIDIA Corp 12.79%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.05%	Apple Inc 11.58%
TREASURY BOND (OTR) 1.03%	Microsoft Corp 8.83%
TREASURY BOND 0.02%	Amazon.com Inc 5.95%
	Alphabet Inc 4.71%
	Broadcom Inc 4.12%
	Alphabet Inc 3.77%
	Meta Platforms Inc 3.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

TLT and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF	XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	20+ year Treasuries	S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year	−6.4%	+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−23.9 pts	−5.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.20%
Holdings	41	52

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or XLG?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −6.4% and XLG returned +12.2%, so XLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, TLT or XLG?: TLT charges 0.15% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TLT against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TLT against XLG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources