Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

TLT vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, TLT returned −7.9% to VB's +14.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about TLT and VB

Net assets: $47.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF, and $76.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF.

At a glance
−7.9%
TLT total return, 1 year
+14.4%
VB total return, 1 year
0.15%
TLT expense ratio
0.03%
VB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VB costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 22.3 points; VB is 1.7 times larger.

TLT vs VB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureTLTVB
Return
Total return, 1 year−7.9%+14.4%
Drawdown
Below its high42.6%, high on Aug 4, 20205.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond IndexMorningstar US Small Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$46.2bn$76.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight22%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, TLT and VB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first TLT VB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in TLT
TREASURY BOND 4.32%
TREASURY BOND 4.12%
TREASURY BOND (OLD) 4.07%
TREASURY BOND 4.02%
TREASURY BOND 3.93%
TREASURY BOND 3.92%
TREASURY BOND 3.89%
TREASURY BOND 3.88%
Only in VB
SLCMT1142 1.31%
Natera Inc 0.72%
Twilio Inc 0.57%
Revolution Medicines Inc 0.53%
Everpure Inc 0.52%
Illumina Inc 0.52%
Okta Inc 0.44%
Moderna Inc 0.44%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF VB Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries Tracks an index of Small-Cap
Total return, 1 year −7.9% +14.4%
Its benchmark over the same days −7.8% (BBLB) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs BBLB not measured
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Holdings 47 1303
Net assets, TLT as of Oct 27, 2026 and VB as of Sep 30, 2026 $47.4bn $76.9bn

TLT and VB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −7.9% with distributions reinvested, against −7.8% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.6% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 28, 2026.

VB

VB tracks an index of Small-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,303 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, TLT or VB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, TLT returned −7.9% and VB +14.4%.
Which is cheaper, TLT or VB?
VB is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, TLT against VB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/tlt-vs-vb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.