Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPYG vs XLY: how they differ
SPYG and XLY hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPYG and XLY hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPYG | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.67% | 24.68% |
| TESLA INC | 1.78% | 17.84% |
| BOOKING HOLDINGS INC | 0.38% | 3.52% |
| MCDONALD S CORP | 0.22% | 4.09% |
| TJX COMPANIES INC | 0.22% | 3.44% |
| DOORDASH INC A | 0.21% | 1.99% |
| MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL CL A | 0.20% | 1.88% |
| O REILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC | 0.20% | 1.85% |
| HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS IN | 0.20% | 1.82% |
| ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD | 0.18% | 1.69% |
| ROSS STORES INC | 0.10% | 1.90% |
| EBAY INC | 0.10% | 1.22% |
| Only in SPYG | Only in XLY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 14.85% | HOME DEPOT INC 5.31% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 10.27% | STARBUCKS CORP 2.96% |
| APPLE INC 6.73% | LOWE S COS INC 2.88% |
| ALPHABET INC CL A 5.47% | GENERAL MOTORS CO 2.03% |
| BROADCOM INC 4.80% | FORD MOTOR CO 1.42% |
| ALPHABET INC CL C 4.38% | CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC 1.21% |
| META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 3.97% | GARMIN LTD 1.16% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 3.09% | NIKE INC CL B 1.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | XLY State Street(R) Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | State Street | State Street |
| What it is | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth | Consumer discretionary |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.9% | −4.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.4 pts | −21.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 150 | 49 |
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 150 positions, with the top ten at 59.8%.
XLY in plain words
XLY is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer discretionary. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 68.7%. It sat 8.9% below its high of Jan 12, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPYG or XLY?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPYG returned +17.9% and XLY returned −4.1%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPYG or XLY?
- SPYG charges 0.04% a year and XLY charges 0.08%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPYG and XLY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPYG and 100% of XLY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPYG against XLY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spyg-vs-xly Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources