Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SPHD vs SPY: how they differ
SPHD and SPY hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and SPY returned more over the year.
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SPHD and SPY hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SPHD | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 1.45% | 1.05% |
| Chevron Corp | 2.11% | 0.61% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | 3.39% | 0.32% |
| PepsiCo Inc | 1.97% | 0.28% |
| AT&T Inc | 2.70% | 0.27% |
| ConocoPhillips | 1.67% | 0.26% |
| Pfizer Inc | 3.38% | 0.24% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 2.08% | 0.20% |
| Medtronic PLC | 1.85% | 0.18% |
| Altria Group Inc | 2.55% | 0.17% |
| Duke Energy Corp | 1.44% | 0.14% |
| Comcast Corp | 2.62% | 0.14% |
| Only in SPHD | Only in SPY |
|---|---|
| ONEOK Inc/OK 2.29% | NVIDIA CORP 8.08% |
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.26% | APPLE INC 7.33% |
| CME E Mini Health Care Select Sector Fut 0.15% | MICROSOFT CORP 5.59% |
| E-mini S&P Real Estate Select Sector Sto 0.14% | AMAZON.COM INC 3.77% |
| CME E Mini Consumer Staples Select Secto 0.12% | ALPHABET INC CL A 2.98% |
| CME E Mini Energy Select Sector Futures 0.05% | BROADCOM INC 2.61% |
| CASH COLLATERAL 0.03% | ALPHABET INC CL C 2.39% |
| META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A 2.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | SPY SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Invesco | State Street |
| What it is | S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility | S&P 500 |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.6% | +17.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −8.9 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.7% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 56 | 505 |
SPHD in plain words
SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 56 positions, with the top ten at 28.1%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPY in plain words
SPY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 505 positions, with the top ten at 38.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SPHD or SPY?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPHD returned +8.6% and SPY returned +17.5%, so SPY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SPHD or SPY?
- SPHD charges 0.30% a year and SPY charges 0.09%, so SPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SPHD and SPY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of SPHD and 100% of SPY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPHD against SPY, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sphd-vs-spy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources