Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs XLK: how they differ

SDY and XLK hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and XLK hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and XLK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYXLK
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP1.21%1.45%
QUALCOMM INC0.89%1.23%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC0.74%1.56%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A2.94%0.72%
MICROSOFT CORP0.54%9.90%
ANALOG DEVICES INC0.46%1.17%
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC0.55%0.26%
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC0.74%0.26%
SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS0.12%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in XLK
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.33%NVIDIA CORP 14.31%
REALTY INCOME CORP 2.12%APPLE INC 12.98%
CHEVRON CORP 2.09%BROADCOM INC 4.62%
PEPSICO INC 1.95%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.23%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.82%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 4.11%
TARGET CORP 1.74%INTEL CORP 3.27%
NIKE INC CL B 1.53%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.80%
KENVUE INC 1.48%PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC A 2.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SDY and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR S&P DividendTechnology
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+39.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts+21.7 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%100.0%
Holdings15774

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLK in plain words

XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or XLK?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or XLK?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against XLK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against XLK, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sdy-vs-xlk Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources