SDOG vs SMIG: how they differ

SDOG and SMIG hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and SDOG returned +20.4% over the year. ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF and Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF.

SDOG costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.7 points.

SDOGSMIG
Expense ratio0.36%0.60%
Net assets, SDOG as of May 31, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026$1.4bn$1.5bn
Total return, 1 year+20.4%+9.7%
Holdings in common4%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.2%42.3%
Below its high6.5%, high on Aug 19, 20266.4%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+20.4%
SDOG total return, 1 year
+9.7%
SMIG total return, 1 year
0.36%
SDOG expense ratio
0.60%
SMIG expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDOG and SMIG hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

4% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding SDOG SMIG
Snap-on Inc 1.91% 4.70%
Watsco Inc 1.88% 2.48%
Only in SDOG
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 3.76%
Texas Instruments Inc 3.02%
Microchip Technology Inc 2.88%
Ford Motor Co 2.82%
Hp Inc 2.69%
Best Buy Co Inc 2.35%
Cvs Health Corp 2.25%
T Rowe Price Group Inc 2.23%
Only in SMIG
Silicon Motion Technology Corp 6.66%
Targa Resources Corp 4.89%
Victory Capital Holdings Inc 4.30%
DT Midstream Inc 4.19%
Hubbell Inc 4.01%
Gildan Activewear Inc 3.78%
Packaging Corp of America 3.30%
NiSource Inc 3.30%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

SDOG
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
SMIG
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +20.4% +9.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +3.2 pts −7.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.36% 0.60%
Already in the S&P 500 97.6% 35.4%
Holdings 50 38
Net assets, SDOG as of May 31, 2026 and SMIG as of Jun 30, 2026 $1.4bn $1.5bn

SDOG and SMIG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SDOG in plain words

SDOG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 26.2%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SMIG in plain words

SMIG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 35% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 38 positions, with the top ten at 42.3%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDOG or SMIG?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDOG returned +20.4% and SMIG +9.7%.
Which is cheaper, SDOG or SMIG?
SDOG is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $24. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDOG and SMIG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of SDOG and 35% of SMIG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, SDOG against SMIG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sdog-vs-smig

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.