IQ

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

SCJL vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

SCJL and VTWO are measured over different days, and VTWO charges 0.06% to SCJL's 0.30%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about SCJL and VTWO

Net assets: $1.1m on Oct 28, 2026 for Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series, and $16.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF.

SCJL on its own →VTWO on its own →
At a glance
−2.0%
SCJL total return, since launch, Jul 2, 2026
+14.3%
VTWO total return, 1 year
0.30%
SCJL expense ratio
0.06%
VTWO expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VTWO costs 0.24 points a year less.

SCJL vs VTWO: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureSCJLVTWO
Return
Total return, 1 yearnot published+14.3%
Drawdown
Below its high7.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksIWMRussell 2000 Index
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points8.6% of 15.0%
Days left in the period246
Period endsJun 30, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.30%0.06%
Net assets, SCJL as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026$1.1m$16.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund5.4%

Method

Side by side

SCJL Corgi U.S. Small-Cap 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
Issuer Corgi Vanguard
What it is Defined outcome, 15% on IWM Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year −2.0% (since launch, Jul 2, 2026) +14.3%
Its benchmark over the same days −5.5% (IWM) (since launch, Jul 2, 2026) +14.1% (IWM)
Gap to its benchmark +3.5 pts vs IWM (since launch, Jul 2, 2026) +0.2 pts vs IWM
Expense ratio 0.30% 0.06%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 2002
Net assets, SCJL as of Oct 28, 2026 and VTWO as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.1m $16.6bn

SCJL and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
SCJL

246 days remained on Oct 27, 2026.

Protection left, in index points: 8.6% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. On Jun 30, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

VTWO

VTWO tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +14.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,002 positions, with the top ten at 5.4%. It sat 7.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are SCJL and VTWO in the same category?
SCJL is a buffer ETF and VTWO is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, SCJL or VTWO?
VTWO is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
IWM vs SCJLIJR vs SCJLSCAU vs VTWOCPRO vs VTWOKMAR vs VTWOCPRY vs VTWOKSEP vs VTWOKFEB vs VTWO
Where to next
iShares Russell 2000 ETF →SCJL on its own →VTWO on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →VTWO dividend history →VTWO holdings →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
SCJL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
Corgi website ↗
VTWO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
VTWO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Vanguard page for VTWO ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, SCJL against VTWO, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/scjl-vs-vtwo

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.