Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

RSSL vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RSSL returned +14.1% to VIOG's +15.8%; 32% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RSSL and VIOG

Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 ETF, and $1.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF.

At a glance
+14.1%
RSSL total return, 1 year
+15.8%
VIOG total return, 1 year
0.08%
RSSL expense ratio
0.10%
VIOG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

RSSL costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points.

RSSL vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSSLVIOG
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.1%+15.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 20268.2%, high on Aug 4, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksRussell 2000 RIC Capped IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.08%0.10%
Net assets, RSSL as of Oct 12, 2026 and VIOG as of Sep 30, 2026$1.4bn$1.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common32%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.2%9.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 123 weekly returns
RSSL VIOG
Return
Total return edge RSSL +42.2% +30.7%
Annualized edge RSSL +16.0% +12.0%
Price return edge RSSL +37.5% +27.6%
Risk
Volatility edge VIOG (slight) 19.7% 18.6%
Max drawdown edge VIOG (slight) −24.7% −24.0%
Downside capture 102.8% 99.5%
Beta 1.06 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge RSSL 0.64 0.48
Sortino edge RSSL 0.96 0.71
Treynor 0.119 0.120
Calmar edge RSSL 0.65 0.50
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.5% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.07 0.29
Information ratio 0.02 0.01
Tracking error 12.1% 2.1%

Each against its own benchmark: RSSL against VOO, Jun 14, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026; VIOG against IJT, Sep 17, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

RSSL returned more: +42.2% to +30.7%. VIOG swung slightly less: 18.6% to 19.7%. VIOG fell slightly less at its worst: −24.0% to −24.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RSSL vs VIOG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSSLVIOGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+42.2%+30.7%RSSLPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.0%+12.0%RSSLTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+37.5%+27.6%RSSLPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.7%18.6%VIOG (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.2%12.5%VIOG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−24.7%−24.0%VIOG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture102.3%98.9%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture102.8%99.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.060.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.630.99Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.640.48RSSLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.960.71RSSLReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1190.120Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.650.50RSSLAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOIJTThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.5% a year+0.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.070.29Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−16.2% to +15.1%−0.9% to +1.2%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.020.01Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error12.1%2.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 123 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

32%

By the books each fund has filed, RSSL and VIOG hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

32% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RSSL VIOG
VIASAT, INC. 0.31% 1.18%
GLAUKOS CORPORATION 0.31% 0.81%
Protagonist Therapeutics Inc 0.27% 1.11%
RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES, INC. 0.27% 0.99%
ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC. 0.27% 0.84%
STONEX GROUP INC. 0.27% 0.85%
ALKERMES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.26% 0.83%
ARGAN, INC. 0.25% 0.65%
TERRENO REALTY CORPORATION 0.25% 0.60%
ZURN ELKAY WATER SOLUTIONS CORPORATION 0.25% 0.83%
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 0.24% 0.82%
TG THERAPEUTICS, INC. 0.24% 0.96%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RSSL
MOOG INC. 0.36%
HUT 8 CORP. 0.36%
UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION 0.35%
CYTOKINETICS, INCORPORATED 0.33%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES, INC. 0.31%
CARETRUST REIT, INC. 0.31%
BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. 0.30%
OLD NATIONAL BANCORP 0.30%
Only in VIOG
FormFactor Inc 1.42%
MSG Knickerbockers Corp 0.85%
Armstrong World Industries Inc 0.83%
Etsy Inc 0.74%
Everus Construction Group Inc 0.73%
Qorvo Inc 0.72%
Lyft Inc 0.69%
Powell Industries Inc 0.65%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF VIOG Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.1% +15.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +15.4% (IJT)
Gap to its benchmark +0.4 pts vs VOO +0.4 pts vs IJT
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.10%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1960 351
Net assets, RSSL as of Oct 12, 2026 and VIOG as of Sep 30, 2026 $1.4bn $1.0bn

RSSL and VIOG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-0C6C7C95AD

RSSL and VIOG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. RSSL follows Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index and VIOG follows S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 32% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
  3. Number of holdings. RSSL holds 1,960 positions and VIOG holds 351.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RSSL

RSSL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,960 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

VIOG

VIOG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 351 positions, with the top ten at 9.9%. It sat 8.2% below its high of Aug 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSSL or VIOG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSSL returned +14.1% and VIOG +15.8%.
Which is cheaper, RSSL or VIOG?
RSSL is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSSL and VIOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of RSSL and 0% of VIOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RSSL against VIOG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rssl-vs-viog

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.