Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

RSP vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RSP returned +16.0% to XLG's +6.4%; 10% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about RSP and XLG

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $99.8bn for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and $11.9bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

At a glance
+16.0%
RSP total return, 1 year
+6.4%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.20%
RSP expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.20% a year; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points; RSP is 8.4 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

RSP vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPXLG
Return
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+6.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Equal Weight IndexS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.20%0.20%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$99.8bn$11.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common10%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund2.7%60.3%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

May 20, 2005 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,118 weekly returns · each against IVV
RSP XLG
Return
Total return edge XLG +694.1% +882.5%
Annualized edge XLG (slight) +10.1% +11.2%
Price return edge XLG +464.8% +572.4%
Risk
Volatility edge XLG 19.3% 17.0%
Max drawdown edge XLG −59.6% −51.7%
Downside capture 102.5% 98.5%
Beta 1.07 0.95
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge XLG 0.50 0.61
Sortino edge XLG 0.71 0.87
Treynor 0.091 0.108
Calmar edge XLG 0.17 0.22
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.2% a year +0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −1.00 0.68
Information ratio −0.09 0.02
Tracking error 5.5% 3.8%
Reading

XLG returned more: +882.5% to +694.1%. XLG swung less: 17.0% to 19.3%. XLG fell less at its worst: −51.7% to −59.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: RSP vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureRSPXLGIVVEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+694.1%+882.5%XLGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+10.1%+11.2%XLG (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+464.8%+572.4%XLGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility19.3%17.0%XLGSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.6%11.8%XLGLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−59.6%−51.7%XLGDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture102.3%97.7%100.0%RSP (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture102.5%98.5%100.0%XLG (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.070.951.00XLG lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.951.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.500.61XLGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.710.87XLGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0910.1080.102XLGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.170.22XLGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVIVVIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.2% a year+0.5% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−1.000.68Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.4% to +1.1%−1.0% to +2.1%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.090.02XLGReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.5%3.8%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,118 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

10%

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and XLG hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

10% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first RSP XLG
Texas Instruments Inc 0.23% 0.67%
Palantir Technologies Inc 0.23% 1.09%
AbbVie Inc 0.23% 1.21%
Eli Lilly & Co 0.22% 2.44%
Walmart Inc 0.22% 1.26%
Procter & Gamble Co 0.22% 0.89%
Tesla Inc 0.22% 2.73%
Apple Inc 0.22% 12.04%
Costco Wholesale Corp 0.22% 1.05%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 0.21% 1.76%
Philip Morris International Inc 0.21% 0.75%
Visa Inc 0.21% 1.63%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in RSP
Moderna Inc 0.30%
PTC Inc 0.30%
Everpure Inc 0.28%
Illumina Inc 0.27%
Accenture PLC 0.27%
Hasbro Inc 0.26%
Mettler-Toledo International Inc 0.26%
Revvity Inc 0.26%
Only in XLG
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 equal weight Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +16.0% +6.4%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (IVV) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +2.3 pts vs IVV −7.3 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 99.8% 98.4%
Holdings 508 53
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $99.8bn $11.9bn

RSP and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BD94EF73BA

RSP and XLG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. RSP follows S&P 500 Equal Weight Index and XLG follows S&P 500 Top 50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 10% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 RSP returned +16.0% and XLG +6.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

RSP and XLG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
RSP

RSP tracks the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 508 positions, with the top ten at 2.7%.

XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or XLG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +16.0% and XLG +6.4%.
Which is cheaper, RSP or XLG?
Neither: RSP and XLG both charge 0.20% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of RSP and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RSP against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rsp-vs-xlg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.