Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
REMX vs XLK: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, REMX returned −19.2% to XLK's +27.1%, and XLK charges 0.08% to REMX's 0.53%.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about REMX and XLK
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $1.5bn for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF and $125.0bn for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLK costs 0.45 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 46.3 points; XLK is far larger, $125.0bn against $1.5bn.
| Measure | REMX | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −19.2% | +27.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 75.1%, high on Apr 11, 2011 | |
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Rare earth and critical materials | Technology Select Sector Index |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 32.6 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.53% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $1.5bn | $125.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 61% | 64.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, REMX and XLK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
REMX and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX
By weight, 9% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 32 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −19.2% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was behind by 32.6 pts. It sits 75.1% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.
XLK
XLK tracks an index of Technology. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 76 positions, with the top ten at 64.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Are REMX and XLK in the same category?
- REMX is a thematic ETF and XLK is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
- Which returned more over the last year, REMX or XLK?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned −19.2% and XLK +27.1%.
- Which is cheaper, REMX or XLK?
- XLK is cheaper, by 0.45 percentage points a year. That is about $45 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, REMX against XLK, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-xlk
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). REMX against XLK. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-xlk
[REMX against XLK (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/remx-vs-xlk)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.