Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

QTR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QTR returned +6.0% to TLT's −4.8%, and TLT charges 0.15% to QTR's 0.25%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about QTR and TLT

Net assets: $10m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF, and $48.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

At a glance
+6.0%
QTR total return, 1 year
−4.8%
TLT total return, 1 year
0.25%
QTR expense ratio
0.15%
TLT expense ratio

Pair scorecard

TLT costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; TLT is far larger, $48.6bn against $10m.

QTR vs TLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureQTRTLT
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.0%−4.8%
Total return, 52 weeks+5.4%
Drawdown
Below its high41.8%, high on Aug 4, 2020
Against its benchmark
What it tracksnot publishedICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index
Treasury bills, 52 weeks+3.7%
Against cash1.7 points ahead
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.25%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$10m$48.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
Risk
Correlation with the S&P 500’s weekly returns+0.91
Beta to the S&P 500+1.34: about 1.34% for each 1%
Its average week when the S&P 500 fellfell 1.79%
Down-week capture167.0%
Weeks the S&P 500 fell26 of 52, by 1.07% on average

Method

Side by side

QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits Alternatives ETF Bond ETF
What it is Hedged equity Tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year +6.0% −4.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.8% (VOO) −4.7% (BBLB)
Gap to its benchmark −8.8 pts vs VOO −0.1 pts vs BBLB
Expense ratio 0.25% 0.15%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 47
Net assets, QTR as of Oct 12, 2026 and TLT as of Nov 3, 2026 $10m $48.3bn

QTR and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

TLT flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
QTR

QTR is a hedged equity fund. ETFIQ measures what every alternatives fund is sold on: whether it moves differently from the stock market. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, its weekly returns had a correlation of +0.91 with the S&P 500’s and a beta of +1.34, so for each 1% the index moved it moved about 1.34% the same way. The S&P 500 fell in 26 of those 52 weeks, by 1.07% on average. In the same weeks QTR fell 1.79% on average, a down-week capture of 167.0%. Over the same 52 weeks QTR returned +5.4% and a Treasury bill fund +3.7%, so it finished 1.7 percentage points ahead of cash.

TLT

TLT tracks an index of 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against −4.7% for its benchmark, the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 41.8% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Nov 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are QTR and TLT in the same category?
QTR is an alternatives ETF and TLT is a bond ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, QTR or TLT?
In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QTR returned +6.0% and TLT −4.8%.
Which is cheaper, QTR or TLT?
TLT is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, QTR against TLT, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qtr-vs-tlt

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.